Inside the Jewish Cryptocracy: The Benjamin Freedman Speech at the Willard Hotel in 1961

"What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world."
-Benjamin H. Freedman (1890-1984)
A Jewish Defector Warns America

Introductory Note

Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City at one time principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.

Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.

This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S.

Benjamin Freedman Speaks:

Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.

What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make -- they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.

I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.

The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I.

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know.

Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.

That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout."

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth."

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema 'Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business."

And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "Made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.

At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "Made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth.

Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.

Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as "Jews". I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as "so-called Jews", because I know what they are). The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves "Jews", were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call "Jews".

There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews."

But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became what we call today "Jews".

Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you. That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world.

Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them. How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason.

Editor's Note: An audio version of this classic speech is also available on the Internet to affrim its authenticity. No man in his right mind could ever conceive of such an insidious international conspiracy. I have certainly taken heed to the contents of this speech and encourage every reader to do so.

The Historical Backdrop of World Wars I and II

The German-Jewish Relationship before the Wars

In 1822, Germany passed the Emancipation Edict which gave everybody in Germany equal rights; no religious discrimination. Up to that time, every country in Europe had quotas: l%, 2%, 3% to become a doctor, a dentist, a lawyer, a banker, a schoolteacher, anything. Germany, in 1822 passed that Emancipation Edict and all the Jews across Europe rushed to Germany, because they could get an education. They could become doctors, lawyers, dentists, druggists. So, when I was in Germany, 50% of the pupils in German schools were Jews from all over Europe. They all ran to Germany. And they worshiped the Germans.

The Details Leading Up to World War I

Baline, a Jew, was the head of the Hamburg-American, North German-Lloyd lines. Even the private bankers, the Hohenzollerns, were Jews. The head of the German General Electric Company was a Jew. The biggest companies, - there was no discrimination at all, in Germany. And the Jews had a picnic there, but they were not the Khazars! They were so-called Jews that came into Western Europe with the Roman armies; that came from Judea when the Romans occupied Western Europe, and there were two houses of worship, one in Speyer, one in Lyons, little stone houses, in the second century, which was 600 years before the Khazars were converted. So the German Jews were just as much apart as the Arabs and the Khazars, today, in fact, there was a saying, I don't know if I can say it in this company, but when I lived in Germany, the Germans said about the Pollocks - (they called them "the Pollocks," the Eastern European Jews), "Where a Pollock pisses, grass will never grow." They hated them! They could never allow their children to marry. So, when Germany was winning the war, the Jews were very happy, because they didn't want Russia to come out the winner, with France and England, because they thought it would be tougher for the Jews in Russia. So, they were all pro-German. What happened? When the Germans trotted out the submarines, - England in August or September, I don't remember just which week, but General Haig, in London, warned the English, "We have less than two week's food supply for the whole nation of 55,000,000 people." The food and ammunition boats were sunk so quickly, they couldn't get food or ammunition.

So, England was offered a Peace Treaty by Germany. They were offered a Peace Treaty twice! It was on the desk of the British War Cabinet, ready to be signed. It needed only one signature. What happened? The Khazar Jews in New York, Washington, led by Brandeis, made this promise through Fleischman & Sockloff in London. They went to the British War Cabinet and they said, "You don't have to make peace - which is tantamount to surrender. We can show you how you can win the war, if, when you defeat Germany, and carve up the Ottoman Empire (or Turkey) you will give us Palestine. And they made that deal. It was all written. I don't say so; Other people don't say so. The Zionists, in the books that they have written, tell this whole story. How they got the promise of Palestine, by promising to use their influence to get U.S. into the war. That's how they are going to turn against the United States; the same way they turned against Germany; after everything Germany did for them, since 1822. They made the deal to bring the United States into the war, which meant certain defeat for Germany; which was triumphant, then; offering a peace that was tantamount to surrender.

So, when that offer was made, the Zionists in London went to the British War Cabinet, according to their own books, their own record, in the British Museum. I circulated thousands of copies of this 12 page memorandum by the man who negotiated it. When they were bombing London in 1945, he thought he'd die. And he typed this out, this true story, and gave it to the British Museum for posterity. That's available. Anyone can have a copy of it. I sent out thousands, - maybe ten thousands of them.

Now, the United States got into World War I. How did they get in? They didn't know how to get us in, because the Germans leaned backwards. They said, "We are going to do nothing on land, on the sea, or in the air, to provoke or justify a declaration of war by the United States, because we'll be licked! Now, we've won the war!" Which they had. The Russian armies were in retreat; in France, the army had revolted, and wouldn't fight. There was no more fight left in the allies. So, what happened?

They went to Great Britain; made this offer; Great Britain accepted it. Then the question came, How to get U.S. into the war? They couldn't get us in if the Germans didn't give us provocation or justification. So, what did they do? A message was sent to Washington, that the S.S. Sussex, a ferry from Dover to Calais, had been torpedoed in the Channel and 38 Americans lost their lives! I'm not going to string this out, because I've got a lot of other things to tell you!

On the basis of the torpedoing, and the loss of 38 lives of our citizens, Congress declared war against Germany. Now, after the 4,000,000 men that General Pershing had been drilling, were on their way over, some of them fighting in Europe - (a lot of you, here, went over, were fighting while this fighting was going on) a member of Parliament and others, who couldn't stand it any longer, they came out with the secret that the Sussex was not sunk and no Americans lives were lost. And we were in the war! Now that is how the Jews got us into World War I, and that started everything because Wilson was elected. We had a national debt of one billion dollars. And since then it has gone up - I think it's now 465 billion, after the wars we've been having, so that's how the Jews got us into World War I.

I knew Judge Samuel Rosen who was Mr. Roosevelt's mentor. They used to say that he didn't go to the water closet without consulting Judge Rosen. I was very friendly (here's somebody who will bear me out) - Now, when it came to World War II, we couldn't get into the war because the Germans said, "When the Americans came into World War I, look what happened to us!" So there was war in Europe again, Germany and European countries, and there was no way to get us into the war. And the pressure of the Jews here, in New York City, Washington, to get into that war was terrific! They didn't know how to do it. So, as Mr. Tanzell wrote in his "Back Door to War," (he was at Georgetown University, a professor of history) - I saw, in the Yale Library, the papers of the Secretary of Defense at that time - we were pushed into World War II by Mr. Roosevelt, through the back door! Germany would give us no justification or provocation. But the Jews, here, were putting pressure on Roosevelt, "We've got to get into that war! We can't let him do that to us!"

The Details Leading Up to World War II

We had to make up our minds what to do, so the United States sent to Japan, and they said, "We can't sell you any more scrap steel or oil." Japan was fighting a war with China; Without scrap steel or oil, which they got altogether from the United States, they would have to withdraw from the war. So they sent nine different Ambassador here, trying to change Mr. Roosevelt's mind. He said, "No, we can't sell you any more, at all." So, at that time, Germany and Japan had a treaty; Any country that declared war on either one was instantly at war with both! So, Mr. Roosevelt figured, "We'll provoke a war with Japan." That's why he threatened them to cut off steel and oil. So they sent nine ambassadors here, and, finally, they couldn't take it much longer, so you know what happened at Pearl Harbor!

Now, Mr. Roosevelt figured, and it's in Mr. Stimson's diary, in his own handwriting, which is in the room at Yale Library containing all Mr. Henry L. Stimson's papers - he was the Secretary of Defense. He wrote in his diary important things that went on (in his own handwriting) and under November 25th, two weeks before Pearl Harbor, he wrote, "The President sent for us to come to the White House. I thought it was to discuss the war in Europe, but he told us that we had to be at war with Japan but he didn't want it to look as if we fired the first shot!" That is almost verbatim. Henry Stimson, the Secretary of Defense wrote that in his diary. That is how we got into the World War, because Roosevelt said, "We want to be at war with Japan, but we don't want it to look as though we fired the first shot"! So we got the first shot, alright, at Pearl Harbor! But, the only way we could be at war with Germany was to be at war with Japan. Then automatically, under their treaty, we were at war with Germany. That's how we got into World War II.

We are now on our way to World War III. The chances are it will be a nuclear war. There is that chance, and I've been fighting, (some time and money) so that the conditions would not be set for that. Now, what happened. The Chairman of Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Mr. Fulbright, stated on Sunday morning television program, which according to the advertising services has 28 million listeners; he said, in answer to a question about the Middle East, he said, "You cannot do anything about the Middle East!" He said, "The Senate is controlled by the Jews; 90% of them have subverted the United States Senate, and you cannot do anything" - or words to that affect.

Now, the Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee of the United States, throws in the sponge, says that 90% of the Senate are controlled by the Jews, meaning the Zionists. So, you may now expect the worst! The only way it can be averted, if it can be avoided, is to alert yourself to these facts. All these lies that you've been told, "That it's your Christian duty to help repatriate "God's Chosen People" to their "Promised Land," is a lot of hog wash. And we are going to be in another war unless you people and others like you wake up the 200,000,000 Christians in this country who have been so brainwashed that they don't know whether they are coming or going! They are running around in circles All you hear is "Jesus was a Jew!" I've told you now that the word didn't exist when Dr. Johnson wrote the dictionary, and I've done all the research on it. It never existed! And then, again, there is the Father here, who will bear witness. Pontius Pilate wrote on the crucifix on which our Lord and Savior was to be crucified, "Jesu Nasarenus Rex Iudoreum" which, translated, anybody that has had one year of Latin, knows that means "Jesus, the Nazarene, the Leader of the Judeans." "Leader of the Judeans," the genitive plural and "Rex" comes from "Rego" - "To lead."

"Now, they were trying to "frame" our Lord and Savior, claiming that he was influencing the people not to pay taxes so that gold couldn't be shipped to Caesar. And that constituted rebellion. That's why the trial was held, and that's why Pontius Pilate put that up on the crucifix, "Leader of the Judeans" who were revolting against Rome. Now we all know everyone of you heard, hundreds of times, that at this trial, Jesus said, "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, and unto God that which is God's." He was not advising the people to withhold taxes paid to Rome. So, you see, you, as representatives, and high representatives of the 200,000,000 Christians in the United States, have got to learn the facts.

As I was talking, here, to one of your erudite members, it's alright to be interested in baseball and basketball and football and golf, cross-word puzzles - I don't know how many hundreds of millions of hours a year was wasted by women doing crossword puzzles! It satisfies their ego to say, "Oh, Minnie, I got all but two words, yesterday!" And they compete with one another. They spend hours, buy dictionaries, and they don't know the first thing about the correct facts of existence. Now, we didn't ask to come into the world; neither did our children, but we owe them a debt. We owe a debt to these men who sacrificed their lives to save this country, so let's see what we can do.

Excerpts from an address delivered by Benjamin Freedman, a former Zionist and defector from the Jewish Power Configuration, in 1974 before a military organization in Washington, DC.
http://zionismunveiled.blogspot.com/

A September 11th Retrospective: The FOX News Investigative Report

Published: 12/12/01 FOX News. A four-part series. The written transcripts are included with the videos for the furtherance of research.

Note: These items have since been removed from the FOX News web site:

Part 1

Fox News - Part1 - Israeli Spy ring
by exprofesso

Carl Cameron Investigates Part 1 - Israel Is Spying In And On The U.S.?

Author: Carl Cameron

Part I:
BRIT HUME, HOST: It has been more than 16 years since a civilian working for the Navy was charged with passing secrets to Israel. Jonathan Pollard pled guilty to conspiracy to commit espionage and is serving a life sentence. At first, Israeli leaders claimed Pollard was part of a rogue operation, but later took responsibility for his work.

Now Fox News has learned some U.S. investigators believe that there are Israelis again very much engaged in spying in and on the U.S., who may have known things they didn't tell us before September 11. Fox News correspondent Carl Cameron has details in the first of a four-part series.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CARL CAMERON, FOX NEWS CORRESPONDENT: Since September 11, more than 60 Israelis have been arrested or detained, either under the new patriot anti-terrorism law, or for immigration violations. A handful of active Israeli military were among those detained, according to investigators, who say some of the detainees also failed polygraph questions when asked about alleged surveillance activities against and in the United States.

There is no indication that the Israelis were involved in the 9-11 attacks, but investigators suspect that they Israelis may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance, and not shared it. A highly placed investigator said there are "tie-ins." But when asked for details, he flatly refused to describe them, saying, "evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

Fox News has learned that one group of Israelis, spotted in North Carolina recently, is suspected of keeping an apartment in California to spy on a group of Arabs who the United States is also investigating for links to terrorism. Numerous classified documents obtained by Fox News indicate that even prior to September 11, as many as 140 other Israelis had been detained or arrested in a secretive and sprawling investigation into suspected espionage by Israelis in the United States.

Investigators from numerous government agencies are part of a working group that's been compiling evidence since the mid '90s. These documents detail hundreds of incidents in cities and towns across the country that investigators say, "may well be an organized intelligence gathering activity."

The first part of the investigation focuses on Israelis who say they are art students from the University of Jerusalem and Bazala Academy. They repeatedly made contact with U.S. government personnel, the report says, by saying they wanted to sell cheap art or handiwork.

Documents say they, "targeted and penetrated military bases." The DEA, FBI and dozens of government facilities, and even secret offices and unlisted private homes of law enforcement and intelligence personnel. The majority of those questioned, "stated they served in military intelligence, electronic surveillance intercept and or explosive ordinance units."

Another part of the investigation has resulted in the detention and arrests of dozens of Israelis at American mall kiosks, where they've been selling toys called Puzzle Car and Zoom Copter. Investigators suspect a front.

Shortly after The New York Times and Washington Post reported the Israeli detentions last months, the carts began vanishing. Zoom Copter's Web page says, "We are aware of the situation caused by thousands of mall carts being closed at the last minute. This in no way reflects the quality of the toy or its salability. The problem lies in the operators' business policies."

Why would Israelis spy in and on the U.S.? A general accounting office investigation referred to Israel as country A and said, "According to a U.S. intelligence agency, the government of country A conducts the most aggressive espionage operations against the U.S. of any U.S. ally."

A defense intelligence report said Israel has a voracious appetite for information and said, "the Israelis are motivated by strong survival instincts which dictate every possible facet of their political and economical policies. It aggressively collects military and industrial technology and the U.S. is a high priority target."

The document concludes: "Israel possesses the resources and technical capability to achieve its collection objectives."

(END VIDEO CLIP)

A spokesman for the Israeli embassy here in Washington issued a denial saying that any suggestion that Israelis are spying in or on the U.S. is "simply not true." There are other things to consider. And in the days ahead, we'll take a look at the U.S. phone system and law enforcement's methods for wiretaps. And an investigation that both have been compromised by our friends overseas.

HUME: Carl, what about this question of advanced knowledge of what was going to happen on 9-11? How clear are investigators that some Israeli agents may have known something?

CAMERON: It's very explosive information, obviously, and there's a great deal of evidence that they say they have collected — none of it necessarily conclusive. It's more when they put it all together. A bigger question, they say, is how could they not have know? Almost a direct quote.

HUME: Going into the fact that they were spying on some Arabs, right?

CAMERON: Correct.

HUME: All right, Carl, thanks very much.

Copyright: Fox News


Part 2

Fox News - Part2 - Israeli Spy ring
by exprofesso

Carl Cameron Investigates Part 2 - Israel Is Spying In And On The U.S.?

Thursday, December 13, 2001

Part 2 of 4

BRIT HUME, HOST: Last time we reported on the approximately 60 Israelis who had been detained in connection with the Sept. 11 terrorism investigation. Carl Cameron reported that U.S. investigators suspect that some of these Israelis were spying on Arabs in this country, and may have turned up information on the planned terrorist attacks back in September that was not passed on.

Tonight, in the second of four reports on spying by Israelis in the U.S., we learn about an Israeli-based private communications company, for whom a half-dozen of those 60 detained suspects worked. American investigators fear information generated by this firm may have fallen into the wrong hands and had the effect of impeded the Sept. 11 terror inquiry. Here's Carl Cameron's second report.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CARL CAMERON, FOX NEWS CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Fox News has learned that some American terrorist investigators fear certain suspects in the Sept. 11 attacks may have managed to stay ahead of them, by knowing who and when investigators are calling on the telephone. How?

By obtaining and analyzing data that's generated every time someone in the U.S. makes a call.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: What city and state, please?

CAMERON: Here's how the system works. Most directory assistance calls, and virtually all call records and billing in the U.S. are done for the phone companies by Amdocs Ltd., an Israeli-based private elecommunications company.

Amdocs has contracts with the 25 biggest phone companies in America, and more worldwide. The White House and other secure government phone lines are protected, but it is virtually impossible to make a call on normal phones without generating an Amdocs record of it.

In recent years, the FBI and other government agencies have investigated Amdocs more than once. The firm has repeatedly and adamantly denied any security breaches or wrongdoing. But sources tell Fox News that in 1999, the super secret national security agency, headquartered in northern Maryland, issued what's called a Top Secret sensitive compartmentalized information report, TS/SCI, warning that records of calls in the United States were getting into foreign hands – in Israel, in particular.

Investigators don't believe calls are being listened to, but the data about who is calling whom and when is plenty valuable in itself. An internal Amdocs memo to senior company executives suggests just how Amdocs generated call records could be used. “Widespread data mining techniques and algorithms.... combining both the properties of the customer (e.g., credit rating) and properties of the specific ‘behavior….’” Specific behavior, such as who the customers are calling.

The Amdocs memo says the system should be used to prevent phone fraud. But U.S. counterintelligence analysts say it could also be used to spy through the phone system. Fox News has learned that the N.S.A has held numerous classified conferences to warn the F.B.I. and C.I.A. how Amdocs records could be used. At one NSA briefing, a diagram by the Argon national lab was used to show that if the phone records are not secure, major security breaches are possible.

Another briefing document said, "It has become increasingly apparent that systems and networks are vulnerable.…Such crimes always involve unauthorized persons, or persons who exceed their authorization...citing on exploitable vulnerabilities."

Those vulnerabilities are growing, because according to another briefing, the U.S. relies too much on foreign companies like Amdocs for high-tech equipment and software. "Many factors have led to increased dependence on code developed overseas.... We buy rather than train or develop solutions."

U.S. intelligence does not believe the Israeli government is involved in a misuse of information, and Amdocs insists that its data is secure. What U.S. government officials are worried about, however, is the possibility that Amdocs data could get into the wrong hands, particularly organized crime. And that would not be the first thing that such a thing has happened. Fox News has documents of a 1997 drug trafficking case in Los Angeles, in which telephone information, the type that Amdocs collects, was used to "completely compromise the communications of the FBI, the Secret Service, the DEO and the LAPD."

We'll have that and a lot more in the days ahead – Brit.

HUME: Carl, I want to take you back to your report last night on those 60 Israelis who were detained in the anti-terror investigation, and the suspicion that some investigators have that they may have picked up information on the 9/11 attacks ahead of time and not passed it on.

There was a report, you'll recall, that the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, did indeed send representatives to the U.S. to warn, just before 9/11, that a major terrorist attack was imminent. How does that leave room for the lack of a warning?

CAMERON: I remember the report, Brit. We did it first internationally right here on your show on the 14th. What investigators are saying is that that warning from the Mossad was nonspecific and general, and they believe that it may have had something to do with the desire to protect what are called sources and methods in the intelligence community. The suspicion being, perhaps those sources and methods were taking place right here in the United States.

The question came up in select intelligence committee on Capitol Hill today. They intend to look into what we reported last night, and specifically that possibility – Brit.

HUME: So in other words, the problem wasn't lack of a warning, the problem was lack of useful details?

CAMERON: Quantity of information.

HUME: All right, Carl, thank you very much.

Copyright: Fox News


Part 3

Fox News - Part3 - Israeli Spy ring
by exprofesso

Carl Cameron Investigates Part 3 : Comverse, CALEA, Israel and the terror investigation

HUME: Last time we reported on an Israeli-based company called Amdocs Ltd. that generates the computerized records and billing data for nearly every phone call made in America. As Carl Cameron reported, U.S. investigators digging into the 9/11 terrorist attacks fear that suspects may have been tipped off to what they were doing by information leaking out of Amdocs.
In tonight's report, we learn that the concern about phone security extends to another company, founded in Israel, that provides the technology that the U.S. government uses for electronic eavesdropping. Here is Carl Cameron's third report.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CARL CAMERON, FOX NEWS CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): The company is Comverse Infosys, a subsidiary of an Israeli-run private telecommunications firm, with offices throughout the U.S. It provides wiretapping equipment for law enforcement. Here's how wiretapping works in the U.S.

Every time you make a call, it passes through the nation's elaborate network of switchers and routers run by the phone companies. Custom computers and software, made by companies like Comverse, are tied into that network to intercept, record and store the wiretapped calls, and at the same time transmit them to investigators.

The manufacturers have continuing access to the computers so they can service them and keep them free of glitches. This process was authorized by the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, or CALEA. Senior government officials have now told Fox News that while CALEA made wiretapping easier, it has led to a system that is seriously vulnerable to compromise, and may have undermined the whole wiretapping system.

Indeed, Fox News has learned that Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller were both warned Oct. 18 in a hand-delivered letter from 15 local, state and federal law enforcement officials, who complained that "law enforcement's current electronic surveillance capabilities are less effective today than they were at the time CALEA was enacted."

Congress insists the equipment it installs is secure. But the complaint about this system is that the wiretap computer programs made by Comverse have, in effect, a back door through which wiretaps themselves can be intercepted by unauthorized parties.

Adding to the suspicions is the fact that in Israel, Comverse works closely with the Israeli government, and under special programs, gets reimbursed for up to 50 percent of its research and development costs by the Israeli Ministry of Industry and Trade. But investigators within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying through Comverse is considered career suicide.

And sources say that while various F.B.I. inquiries into Comverse have been conducted over the years, they've been halted before the actual equipment has ever been thoroughly tested for leaks. A 1999 F.C.C. document indicates several government agencies expressed deep concerns that too many unauthorized non-law enforcement personnel can access the wiretap system. And the FBI's own nondescript office in Chantilly, Virginia that actually oversees the CALEA wiretapping program, is among the most agitated about the threat.

But there is a bitter turf war internally at F.B.I. It is the FBI's office in Quantico, Virginia, that has jurisdiction over awarding contracts and buying intercept equipment. And for years, they've thrown much of the business to Comverse. A handful of former U.S. law enforcement officials involved in awarding Comverse government contracts over the years now work for the company.

Numerous sources say some of those individuals were asked to leave government service under what knowledgeable sources call "troublesome circumstances" that remain under administrative review within the Justice Department.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

And what troubles investigators most, particularly in New York, in the counter terrorism investigation of the World Trade Center attack, is that on a number of cases, suspects that they had sought to wiretap and survey immediately changed their telecommunications processes. They started acting much differently as soon as those supposedly secret wiretaps went into place – Brit.

HUME: Carl, is there any reason to suspect in this instance that the Israeli government is involved?

CAMERON: No, there's not. But there are growing instincts in an awful lot of law enforcement officials in a variety of agencies who suspect that it had begun compiling evidence, and a highly classified investigation into that possibility – Brit.

HUME: All right, Carl. Thanks very much.

Content and Programming Copyright 2001 Fox News Network


Part 4

Note: The Video is not available for Part 4, but the Transcript is still available, thus completing the series. Editor's Note: I was able to locate Part 4 of this series. I am thrilled over this discovery. Updated 10/23/09. The series is now complete.

Part 4: Carl Cameron Investigates
FNC
Carl Cameron
Monday, December 17, 2001



TONY SNOW, HOST: This week, senior correspondent Carl Cameron has reported on a longstanding government espionage investigation. Federal officials this year have arrested or detained nearly 200 Israeli citizens suspected of belonging to an "organized intelligence-gathering operation." The Bush administration has deported most of those arrested after Sept. 11, although some are in custody under the new anti-terrorism law.

Cameron also investigates the possibility that an Israeli firm generated billing data that could be used for intelligence purpose, and describes concerns that the federal government's own wiretapping system may be vulnerable. Tonight, in part four of the series, we'll learn about the probable roots of the probe: a drug case that went bad four years ago in L.A.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CARL CAMERON, FOX NEWS CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Los Angeles, 1997, a major local, state and federal drug investigating sours. The suspects: Israeli organized crime with operations in New York, Miami, Las Vegas, Canada, Israel and Egypt. The allegations: cocaine and ecstasy trafficking, and sophisticated white-collar credit card and computer fraud.

The problem: according to classified law enforcement documents obtained by Fox News, the bad guys had the cops’ beepers, cell phones, even home phones under surveillance. Some who did get caught admitted to having hundreds of numbers and using them to avoid arrest.

"This compromised law enforcement communications between LAPD detectives and other assigned law enforcement officers working various aspects of the case. The organization discovered communications between organized crime intelligence division detectives, the FBI and the Secret Service."

Shock spread from the DEA to the FBI in Washington, and then the CIA. An investigation of the problem, according to law enforcement documents, concluded, "The organization has apparent extensive access to database systems to identify pertinent personal and biographical information."

When investigators tried to find out where the information might have come from, they looked at Amdocs, a publicly traded firm based in Israel. Amdocs generates billing data for virtually every call in America, and they do credit checks. The company denies any leaks, but investigators still fear that the firm's data is getting into the wrong hands.

When investigators checked their own wiretapping system for leaks, they grew concerned about potential vulnerabilities in the computers that intercept, record and store the wiretapped calls. A main contractor is Comverse Infosys, which works closely with the Israeli government, and under a special grant program, is reimbursed for up to 50 percent of its research and development costs by Israel's Ministry of Industry and Trade.

Asked this week about another sprawling investigation and the detention of 60 Israeli since Sept. 11, the Bush administration treated the questions like hot potatoes.

ARI FLEISCHER, WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY: I would just refer you to the Department of Justice with that. I'm not familiar with the report.

COLIN POWELL, SECRETARY OF STATE: I'm aware that some Israeli citizens have been detained. With respect to why they're being detained and the other aspects of your question – whether it's because they're in intelligence services, or what they were doing – I will defer to the Department of Justice and the FBI to answer that.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

CAMERON: Beyond the 60 apprehended or detained, and many deported since Sept. 11, another group of 140 Israeli individuals have been arrested and detained in this year in what government documents describe as "an organized intelligence gathering operation," designed to "penetrate government facilities." Most of those individuals said they had served in the Israeli military, which is compulsory there.

But they also had, most of them, intelligence expertise, and either worked for Amdocs or other companies in Israel that specialize in wiretapping. Earlier this week, the Israeli embassy in Washington denied any spying against or in the United States – Tony.

SNOW: Carl, we've heard the comments from Ari Fleischer and Colin Powell. What are officials saying behind the scenes?

CAMERON: Well, there's real pandemonium described at the FBI, the DEA and the INS. A lot of these problems have been well known to some investigators, many of who have contributed to the reporting on this story. And what they say is happening is supervisors and management are now going back and collecting much of the information, because there's tremendous pressure from the top levels of all of those agencies to find out exactly what's going on.

At the DEA and the FBI already a variety of administration reviews are under way, in addition to the investigation of the phenomenon. They want to find out how it is all this has come out, as well as be very careful because of the explosive nature and very political ramifications of the story itself – Tony.

SNOW: All right, Carl, thanks.

Copyright: FOX News.

Zionist Jews and the Homosexual Movement

"Here is an exhaustive list proving, once and for all, that the radical homosexual movement in the United States is a Jewish movement. Jews created it and run it from top to bottom. They are pushing the perversion and degeneracy that is spreading disease, sin and sickness through America like a wildfire."


The Major Players

Larry Kramer — co-founder of "Act Up," a homosexual/AIDS activist organization; co-founder of the Gay Men's Health Crisis

Alan Klein — co-founder of group ACT UP, co-founder of group Queer Nation, National Communications Director and chief spokesperson for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD]. Klein also co-founded the successful multimedia campaign STOPDRLAURA.COM

Arnie Kantrowitz — co-founder of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].

Jonathan D. Katz — founded and chairs the Harvey Milk Institute, the largest queer studies institute in the world. A long time queer political activist, was a co-founder of Queer Nation, [the key San Francisco branch].

Harvey Fierstein — film actor [Mrs. Doubtfire]; well-known gay activist.

Moisés Kaufman — playwright and film director [The Laramie Project].

Israel Fishman — founder of the Gay Liberation Caucus in 1970 [now known as the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered Round Table of the American Library Association], the world's first gay professional organization.

Bella Abzug and Edward Koch — both Jewish — the first members of the U.S. House of Representatives to introduce legislation banning discrimination based on sexual orientation [1974].

Winnie Stachelberg — political director, Human Rights Campaign [HRC]

Michael S. Aronowitz, The New York Log Cabin Republicans.

Tony Kushner — gay activist; Tony and 1993 Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright [for Angels in America, 1992].

Len Hirsch — president of the GLBT federal government employees group, GLOBE.

Meg Moritz, Ph.D. — a Director and member of the Executive Committee of GLAAD.

Barbara Raab — an NBC-TV producer; a "Jewish lesbian feminist journalist, writer."

Charles Kaiser [?] — author & founding member of National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA].

David Goodstein — owner/publisher of the gay magazine The Advocate [1975-1985]; co-founder of the National Gay Rights Lobby.

Judy Wieder — Editor-in-chief, The Advocate gay magazine.

Alison Bechdel [?] — cartoonist creator and author of the bi-weekly comic strip "Dykes to Watch Out For."

Kevin Koffler — Editor-in-chief, Genre gay magazine.

Garrett Glaser — National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA] national board member.

Ronald Gold — reporter for Variety; a leader in the fight to overturn the American Psychiatric Association's policy that homosexuality is an illness.

Magnus Hirschfeld [d. 1935], early gay rights activist in Germany; founded one of the first gay rights organizations, the Scientific Humanitarian Committee; coined the term "transvestism"; fled Nazi Germany.

Fred Hochberg — deputy administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration; co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign [HRC].

Michael Berman — member, Human Rights Campaign Board of Directors. Mitchell Gold — HRC Board Marty Lieberman — HRC Board Andy Linsky — HRC Board Dana Perlman — HRC Board Abby Rubenfeld — HRC Board Andrew Tobias — HRC Board Lara Schwartz — Senior Counsel, HRC Heather Wellman — HRC Field Coordinator Dan Furmansky — HRC Senior Field Organizer, West Sally Green — HRC Associate Field Director

Rick Rosendall [?] — President, Gay & Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington, DC.

Barney Frank — member of U.S. Congress; helped create non-discriminatory employment policies in all U.S. federal agencies

Kerry Lobel — executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

Robin Margolis, American coordinator of the Bi Women's Cultural Alliance and author [Bisexuality: A Practical Guide].

Evan Wolfson, Senior Staff Attorney, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund — and — the executive director of Freedom to Marry.

Jennifer Einhorn — Communications Director, Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD] Nancy Alpert [?] — Treasurer, GLAAD Judy Gluckstern — Board of Directors, GLAAD. Stephen M. Jacoby — Board of Directors, GLAAD. Matt Riklin — Board, GLAAD Carol Rosenfeld — Board, GLAAD. William Weinberger — Board, GLAAD Tanya Wexler — Board, GLAAD. David Huebner — GLAAD Counsel.

Richard Goldstein — Village Voice writer on gay culture and politics

Ron Schlittler — Director of Field & Policy, Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays [PFLAG].

Craig Ziskin — Deputy Director of Development, PFLAG.

Debra Weill — Senior Field & Policy Coordinator, PFLAG.

Dody Goldstein — Board of Directors, PFLAG.

David Horowitz — Board of Directors, PFLAG.

Shawn Frank — Board of Directors, PFLAG.

Leon Weinstein — Chair, Nominating Committee, PFLAG.

Kate Kendell [?], National Center for Lesbian Rights.

Gayle Rubin — lesbian author/activist.

Hilary Rosen — a founding member of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund; former board co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign.

Roz Richter, American attorney and activist.

Bob Kunst — long-time activist in gay and Jewish causes.

"Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network" [GLSEN]. Board co-chairs: Marty Seldman, president

"National Gay & Lesbian Task Force" [NGLTF]. Board co-chairs: ..... Rachel Rosen in Santa Fe, N.M Dave Fleischer — Director of Training [political training], NGLTF. Craig Hoffman — Board of Directors, NGLTF. Beth Zemsky — Board, NGLTF. Marsha C. Botzer — Treasurer, NGLTF. Jeff Levi — first, Levi was NGTF's lobbyist, early 1980s [NGTF became NGLTF in 1985]. Later, he was NGLTF executive director.

Bill Rubenstein, J.D. '86, developed the ACLU Lesbian and Gay Rights Project

Martin Duberman — author/historian; founded the Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies at the City University of New York.

Ben Schatz '81, J.D. '85, is executive director of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Foundation.

Kevin Schaub, American; Executive Director and Dean of the Harvey Milk Institute in San Francisco, the world's largest center for queer studies.

Sarah Schulman [1958- ], American playwright, novelist, and activist [one of the founders of the Lesbian Avengers, a direct-action lesbian rights organization].

Susan Spielman — principal/head of Common Ground, an education/consulting firm specializing in workplace sexual orientation education; her company has worked with hundreds of U.S. organizations, helping them to implement domestic partner benefits plans; co-author of the book Straight Talk About Gays in the Workplace.

Gertrude Stein — wrote the first openly lesbian novel, "Q.E.D.," in 1903, but it was only published posthumously in 1950.

Rikki Streicher (1925-1994), American activist and businesswoman.

Michael Goff — founded Out magazine in 1992.

Paulette Goodman — founder of local chapter [Washington D.C.] of PFLAG and served as President of the National PFLAG organization from 1988-1992.

Jeffrey Newman, American, president and COO of the Gay Financial Network; president and CEO of out.com.

Jim Levin — New York gay historian.

Barrett Brick — GLAA [Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance] Treasurer.

Robin Tyler — American comedian [born Arlene Chernick] who was the first openly gay comic in North America; Tyler is also an activist who was the stage producer for the first three gay marches on Washington and the national protest coordinator for the "Stop Dr. Laura" campaign; she produces women's comedy and music festivals, and operates a lesbian travel-tour company.

Dr. Bruce Voeller [1935?-1994] [?] American gay rights activist, molecular biologist, physiologist, and AIDS researcher (pioneer in the use of nonoxynol-9 as a spermicide); cofounder and first executive director of the National Gay Task Force; creator of the Mariposa Foundation [an AIDS prevention research organization].

Mark Elderkin [?] — co-founded Gay.com.

Leroy Aarons — American professor, journalist, and founder of the National Gay and Lesbian Journalists Association (1990).

Dr. Donald I. Abrams — American physician, HIV expert, medical marijuana researcher, and past president of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association.

Johnny Abush (1952-2000) — [Canadian]; archivist of the International Jewish GBLT Archives.

Roberta Achtenberg [1950- ]; civil rights lawyer and federal official; appointed as Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity by President Bill Clinton in 1993.

Miriam Ben-Shalom [1948- ], American Army Reserves drill sergeant and gay activist; in 1986 she won a ten-year legal battle with the Reserves when a court ordered her reinstatement; founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Veterans Association [GLBVA] in 1990, serving as its first president.

Larry Brinkin, American gay activist who brought the first domestic partnership lawsuit [against Southern Pacific Railroad, 1982].

Rob Eichberg, American psychologist, co-creator of National Coming Out Day [October 11th].

Scott Evertz, American; in April 2001, President Bush appointed him to serve as the Director of the White House Office of National AIDS Policy [ONAP].

Gene Falk [?, Jewish name], American business executive; Senior Vice President of the Showtime Digital Media Group; part of the team that launched and marketed the U.S. TV series Queer as Folk; Chair of the Board of Directors of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].

Surina Kahn — American lesbian activist.

Larry Kessler — founding director in 1983 of the AIDS Action Committee of Massachusetts, the largest AIDS support organization in New England.

Kathy Levinson — American investor and philanthropist; serves on the board of PlanetOut; also on NGLTF Board of Directors.

Judith Light — actress, activist for gay causes.

David Mixner — gay activist, political consultant; co-founder of the Municipal Elections Committee of Los Angeles [MECLA], a group of wealthy gays and lesbians who became influential in local politics; president Bill Clinton's Special Liaison to the Gay-Lesbian Community.

Dan Savage — American author of gay-themed books [The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant; Skipping Towards Gomorrah: The Seven Deadly Sins and the Pursuit of Happiness in America] and gay-themed- sex-advice columnist [Savage Love].

Susan Schuman, American executive vice-president and general manager of the Planet Out gay and lesbian online service.

Scott Seomin, American entertainment media coordinator for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].

Jason Serinus [Jay Guy Nassberg] — founder and coordinator of the Lavender Healing Network; a former gay activist with the New York chapter of the Gay Liberation Front.

David Sine [?] — American CEO of C1TV, the first U.S. gay and lesbian cable TV network.

Rex Wockner — longtime gay, American journalist who has reported news for the gay press since 1985.

Jack Fritscher — became Editor in Chief of Drummer gay magazine [1977].

Leslie Feinberg [1949- ], American trade unionist, transgender activist and author [Transgender Warriors: Making History from Joan of Arc to RuPaul].

Allan Ginsburg - late Jewish poet and leading member of North American Man Boy Love Association

Source: News from the West
http://iamthewitness.com

Editor's Disclaimer: References to any source does not equivocate an endorsement by me.

Jewish Dominance in Pre-Nazi Germany

Pre-Nazi Germany is yet another of the dramatic examples of the rise of
Jewish economic influence and control in European countries, in this case violently
ended by the Nazi destruction of German Jewry. Jews numbered at most
about one per cent of the German population between 1871 and 1933, and this
percentage had been steadily declining [GORDON, p. 8] but by the end of the
eighteenth century, “a high proportion of the landed and liquid wealth in Prussia
was in the hands of either nobles or Jews.” [HERTZ, p. 36] By 1908, 12 of the
20 richest Berliners were of Jewish ancestry, as were 11 of the 25 richest people
in Prussia. [MOSSE, W., 1987, p. 208] Of the top 200 Prussian millionaires, 55
were Jewish. Of the top 800, 190 were of Jewish extraction. [MOSSE, p. 30] 41%
of Prussian iron and scrap iron firms, and 57% of other metal businesses were
owned by Jews. [GORDON, p. 11] Although Jews in 1903 were only 0.74% of
the labor force in Prussia, 27% of all Prussian lawyers were Jews, as were 10%
of apprenticed lawyers, 47% of magistrates, and 30% of all higher ranks of the
judiciary. [GORDON, p. 13]

By the 1930s, 46% of German Jews were self-employed. [KOTKIN, p. 43] In
1932, six million Germans were unemployed. [RUBENSTEIN, R.L., p. 117] In
the town of Sonderburg, in the Rhineland area of Germany, “of the five largest
employers, two were Jewish firms; in one case, the Jewish-owned mill employed
hundreds of Gentile workers – as many as 20 percent of the working adult labor
force. In a very real sense, the Gentile community depended on Jews for
employment and for retail goods.” [HENRY, F., p. 52]

Gentile fortunes in Germany and its environs were based in landownership
and agriculture; Jewish fortunes were founded upon banking and finance.
[MOSSE p. 206] In Berlin, by the eighteenth century, “the income of Jews in the
middle of the Jewish tax scale would be about three times higher than the average
Berliner. The middle of the Jewish tax scale would thus be approximately
equal to the top ten per cent of Berlin households.” [LOWENSTEIN] The average
income of Jews in pre-Nazi Germany was 3.2 times higher than the rest of
the population. [NIEWYK, p. 16] “At the end of the eighteenth century 400
Jewish families formed one of the wealthiest groups in Berlin … In Bavaria, in
1808, 80% of government loans were endorsed and negotiated by Jews.”
[ARENDT, p. 17] By 1914 the Jews of Berlin – 5 per cent of that city’s population
– paid over a third of its taxes [MOSSE, W., 1987, p. 13] and there were “a
large number of domestic servants in the two most important Jewish areas of
Berlin during the 1920’s.” [GORDON, p. 15]

In 1923, 150 of the 161 privately-owned banks in Berlin were Jewish; [GORDON,
p. 11] “In Berlin alone,” notes Jewish author Edwin Black, “about 75% of
the attorneys, and nearly as many doctors, were Jewish.” [BLACK, p. 58] “All the
major Berlin department stores – Wertheim, Herman Tietz, N. Israel,
KaDeWe,” says Jewish author Peter Wyden, “were the properties of Jews. All the
principal newspaper publishers and thirteen of the drama critics were Jews.
Garment manufacturing, a major industry, was generally known to be in Jewish
hands.” [WYDEN, p. 21] “In Germany,” says Nachum Gidal, “Jews above all
developed the setting up of department stores, the manufacture and readymade
ladies and gentlemen’s clothing, the tobacco, leather, and fur industries
and the new film industry.” [GIDAL, p. 17]

By 1823, the Bavarian government owed 23% of its public debt to Jews; as
early as 1818, there was growing complaint about excessive Jewish influence in
Germany. One German writer, Garlieb Merkel, noted that while the “German
peoples had, in many years of political disaster lost their precious political
rights and had diminished in stature, [Jews] had increased their wealth at a terrifying
rate. They knew how gain equality with Christians everywhere and they
zealously set about developing this equality into further privileges.” “This statement
of Merkel has some truth in it,” says scholar Jacob Katz, “Jews had
exploited, economically and socially, the new status they had achieved in the
past generation.” [KATZ, From, p. 94] With formal emancipation, the Jews of
Berlin, complained Merkel, “now bought up every house afforded for sale in the
main streets and filled the cities with their shops. The Jews had long dominated
in financial deals and trade in bills. Now they led in occupations such as the
book trade … Almost all the country homes on both sides of the Tiergarten, the
Berliners only place of recreation, had passed into Jewish hands … The Jews has
made their gains at the expense of other citizens.” [KATZ, From, p. 94-95]
The Jewish-French intellectual, Bernard Lazare, noted in 1894 that:
“In Germany [Jewish] activity was exceedingly great. They were at the
bottom of legislation favorable to the carrying on of banking and exchange,
the practice of usury and speculation. It was they who profited
by the abolition, in 1867, of the ancient laws limiting the rate of interest.

They were active in bringing about the enactment of the law of June
1870, which exempted stock companies from government supervision.
After the Franco-German War, they were among the boldest speculators,
and at a time when German capitalists were carried away by a passion
for the creation of industrial combinations, they acted a no less
important part than had the Jews of France, from 1830 to 1848. Their
activity persisted until the financial panic of 1873, when the country
squires and the small traders who had been ruined by the excesses of this
Grunder Periode in which the Jew had played the most important part,
gave themselves up to the most violent anti-Semitism, such, indeed, as
proceeds only from injured interests.” [LAZARE, p. 166]

With the rise of consolidated corporations in the late 1800’s and early
1900’s, says W. E. Mosse, a Jewish scholar, “a picture emerges of a number of
[German] companies with significant Jewish representation in the top positions,
which constitutes something of a network with certain common features
and common interests.” [MOSSE, W., 1987, p. 219] For those men with “multiple
board memberships” in a variety of major companies, 18 men had more
than 21 board positions each. Of these 18, 10 were Jewish. [MOSSE, p. 257]
“The distribution of these Jewish board members among major companies
shows a distinctive interlocking pattern.” [MOSSE, W., 1987, p. 253]
This typical business formulation had been evidenced in the German elite
some years earlier when Jews tried to gain acceptance into Masonic lodges.

Jacob Katz notes that:
“Members of the lodge were expected to communicate with each other
on equal footing. Jews, so the complaint ran, tended to cluster together
whenever they appeared in the lodge, creating a subgroup, a clique.
Similar observances were made in other quarters as well. I do not think
this accusation was a figment of their imagination with no basis in fact.
Jewish historical experience, as well as Jewish concepts and practices,
created a mentality functioning as a factor of cohesion among Jews and
thereby as a barrier between them and non-Jews.” [KATZ, RoGH, p. 5]

Many German Jews were known to have, at least officially, converted to
Christianity. Like the Spanish Marranos, this was often merely expeditious. As
the German Jewish poet Heinrich Heine observed, baptism was “the ticket of
admission into German culture.” [VARON, p. 10] Heine himself, notes Nahum
Goldmann, “was a very good Jew at the end of his life and [his] conversion to
Christianity was only a formality.” [GOLDMANN, N., 1978, p. 66] Popular
German Jewish author Emil (born Cohen) Ludwig’s “conversion to Christianity
had been merely an effort to buy the respect of Germans.” [MOSSE, G.,
1985, p. 26] “Often one submitted [to baptism],” notes Adam Weisberger, “as
an opportunistic matter of convenience … A Jewish origin was a handicap but
one which baptism could remedy.” [WEISBERGER, A., 1997, p. 48] (Even in
America, noted James Yaffe, reflecting a theme, “Serge Koussevitzky, Eugene
Ormandy, and Pierre Monteux, all Jews, had to convert to Christianity in order
to reach the top of the symphony world.”) [YAFFE, J., 1968, p. 52]

Even among the wealthy assimilationists to German society in the Jewish
communities “mixed marriages were the exception rather than the rule and the
Jews continued to live a life apart. They interacted with non-Jews in their professional
lives, but very seldom in private.” [TRAVERSO, p. 15] This model even
parallels the wealthy German-Jewish situation in the United States in the same
era: “The social solidarity [in America] was no way better exemplified and furthered
than by the tendency – common to all unified elite – to intermarry …
[SUPPLE, p. 80] … German-Jewish investment banking [in the U. S.] in the late
19th century … was … based upon the proliferation of kinship groups … it
seems possible to say that the German-Jewish groups had a strategic role to play
in the providing of capital from Germany for American industrial development.”
[SUPPLE, p. 84-85] By 1937 nine of America’s richest 60 families were
Jewish, including the Guggenheims, Lehmans, Warburgs, Kahns, Schiffs, Blumenthals,
Friedsams, Rosenwalds, and Baruchs. [GOLDSTEIN, D. p. 101]

Stephen Birmingham notes that the insularity of the wealthy Jewish strata in
America: “For forty-five years after its founding in 1867, Kuhn, Loeb, and Company
had no partners who were not related by blood or marriage to the Loeb-
Kuhn-Wolff family complex. For nearly fifty years after Goldman, Sachs was
founded, all partners were members of the intermarried Goldman and Sachs
family. The Lehmans hardly seemed to need intermarriage at all: until 1924,
nearly 75 years after the firm was founded, all the partners were named Lehman.”
[BIRMINGHAM, p. 9-10]

By 1907-08 Jews had a conspicuous presence in the corporate sector of the
German economy. Despite representing only one per cent of the German population,
20 per cent of the largest companies had a “substantial” Jewish involvement.
A further 16 per cent had “significant’ Jewish management. [MOSSE, W.,
1987, p. 273] Examining the very largest companies, W. E. Mosse notes that
over two-thirds of such firms had a “significant Jewish component.” Of the
most powerful corporate organizations in Germany, only 7.7 per cent were
“without some degree of Jewish participation.” [MOSSE, p. 273, 274] In 1913,
fifteen Jews held 211 seats on boards of German banks; by 1928 this number
was 718. In that same year Jews represented 80% of the leading members of the
Berlin stock exchange. Five years later the Nazis expelled 85% of all stockbrokers
because of “race.” [GORDON, p. 12]

In the pre-World War II Weimar Republic of Germany that fell to the Nazis,
11% of Germany’s doctors were Jews, and 16% of its lawyers. [MOSSE, p. 26]
By 1909-10, about one-fourth of the teachers at German universities were of
Jewish descent. [GORDON, p. 13] As elsewhere, an expediential prerequisite
for advancement was at least superficial conversion to Christianity. “Those who
were baptized,” says Nachum Gidal, “were then eligible to be appointed to professional
chairs.” [GIDAL, p. 17] “In the spring of 1933,” notes Anthony Heilbut,
“Hitler shocked the world by dismissing from their jobs the titans of
German scholarship, the vast majority of whom were Jewish.” [HEILBUT,
p. 23] (Adolf Hitler’s family doctor had been Jewish. Hitler’s sister was even
once employed by the Mensa Academica Judaica in Vienna. Hitler was awarded
a medal of honor for his deeds in World War I; the award was reportedly expedited
by a Jewish army officer, Hugo Gutmann.) [GOLDBERG, M., 1976, p. 38-
39]

Almost 80% of department and chain store business in pre-war Germany
were Jewish, 40% of wholesale textile firms, and 60% of the wholesale and retail
clothing business. By 1895, 56% of German Jews were involved in commerce;
correspondingly, only 10% of non-Jewish Germans were in this field.
[TRAVERSO, p.15] By the 1930s, Jews controlled 90% of the world’s fur trade,
reflected in an important yearly auction in Leipzig. [BLACK, p. 131] “Jews were
also important in the wholesale metal business and retail grocery business.” In
Upper Silesia more than half of the local industry – coal, iron, steel, petroleum,
et al – was owned or directed by Jews before 1933. [NIEWYK, p. 13-14] “The
coal and iron industry of Upper Silesia,” says Sidney Osborne, “– the second
largest in Germany – was almost the exclusive creation of a handful of Jews.”
[OSBORNE, S., 1939, p. 18]

This area included the Jewish-owned iron company owned by Mortiz Friedlander,
Sinai Levy and David Lowenfeld; the “well-known iron and steel works,
Bismarkshutte” which was founded by two Jewish merchants; an “extensive iron
pipe and tube works” owned by Mortiz Hahn and Simon Huldschinsky; the
Upper Silesian Iron Industry (with branches Tubenhutte and Baildonhutte);
“one of the largest enamel works” in Germany; Ferrum, and iron and steel firm;
the Upper Silesian Zinc Foundries company; the “coke-oven industry Gluckauf;
the Upper Silesian Coke and Chemical Works; and coal mining (Otto Friedlander).
[OSBORNE, S., 1939, p. 18] “Other important industries in Jewish
hands,” adds Sidney Osborne,
“were leather, textiles, and cigarette factories, the Portland cement
and lime industry, and important iron and lumber interests. This account
of Jewish enterprise in Upper Silesia is given with some particularity
because it was more or less typical of what was going on in other
industrial regions of Germany.” [OSBORNE, S., 1939, p. 19]

“The Hirsch copper works in Halberstadt…”, notes Nachum Gidal,
“[became] the most important copper and brass works in Europe. The works
was still owned by the Orthodox family until 1933. In the basic materials industry,
Fritz von Friedlander-Fuld (1858-1917) was outstanding with his Silesian
enterprises … [comprising] a group of major firms. Friedlander-Fuld was
responsible for building up the coke industry in Germany … Closely linked
with the coke industry was the petroleum industry, led by general director M.
Melamid … The founder of the Silesian iron industry (Caro-Hegenschedt) was
George von Caro … His brother Oskar Caro … is regarded as the founder of
the German enamel industry. Mortiz von der Porten … spearheaded the aluminum
sector in Germany.” [GIDAL, p. 266] Wilhelm Von Gutmann’s Gebruder
Gutmann Industries “was the largest single factor in the coal industry of the
Austro-Hungarian empire.” [GREENBERG, M., p. 70] Philip Rosenthal
founded “the most famous porcelain factory in Selb in Bavaria.” [GIDAL,
p. 267] Albert Balin “played an outstanding part in the building up of the German
merchant fleet … Under his guidance [the Hamburg-America line] developed
into Europe’s leading shipping company.” Walter Rathenau was president
of the “Siemens works, the largest electricity company in Germany.” [GIDAL,
p. 266-268]

In the 1930s, notes Ian Kershaw, during Nazi efforts to politicize the German
peasants against Jews in the Alzenau district,
“Jewish-owned cigar factories dominated local industry … Jews in
fact owned most of the twenty-nine factories, with a combined work
force of 2,206 women and 280 men … In the countryside … the main
issue was the remaining dominance in many areas of the Jewish cattle
dealer, the traditional middle-man and purveyor of credit for untold
numbers of German peasants … [As late as 1935,] the wholesale cattle
trade in Ebermannstadt was … still ‘to a good ninety percent’ in Jewish
hands.” [KERSHAW, p. 241-242]

Jews were likewise dramatically over represented in every sphere of aca
demic enterprise, from philosophy to science. “Jews were also the most influential
critics of drama, art, music, and books as well as the owners of the most
important art galleries and theatres.” [GOLDBERG, p. 26] In the Berlin of 1930,
80% of the theatre directors were Jewish and they authored 75% of the produced
plays. [MACDONALD, p. 125] Many prominent actors, actresses, and
moviemakers were Jewish. Some Jewish scholars, like Walter Laquer, have even
went so far as to claim that without Jewish influence the culture of the pre-Nazi
Weimar Republic “would not have existed.” [TRAVERSO, p. 12] “Jews,” says
Laquer, “were prominent among Expressionist poets, among the novelists of
the 1920’s, among the theatrical producers and, for a while, among the leading
figures of cinema.” [LAQUER, p. 73] “Jewish names,” notes Nachum Gidal,
“were numerous among the pioneers of film and the film industry,” [GIDAL,
p. 370] including Paul Davidson and Herman Fellner who founded “the first
German film company.” [GIDAL, p. 370]

Frederick Grunfeld romanticizes the Jewish road from an economic base to
enormous influence upon German popular culture:
“The shoe-factory generation regularly produced and nurtured a
brood of scribes, artists, intellectuals. Else Lasker-Schuler was the
daughter of an investment banker, Carl Sternheim the son of a banker
and newspaper publisher, Walter Benjaim of an antique dealer, Alfred
Neumann of a lumber merchant, Stefan Zweig of a textile manufacturer,
Franz Kafka of a haberdashery wholesaler, Herman Bloch of a cotton-
mill owner; Theodore Lessing and Walter Hasenclver were sons of
doctors and grandsons of manufacturers, and so on, in an orderly and
predictable procession from the department store into the library, the
theatre and the concert hall.” [GRUNFELD, F., 1996, p. 28-29]
Most of the members of the famously influential “Frankfurt School” of politics,
philosophy, and culture were also Jewish – Max Horkheimer, Herbert
Marcuse, Friedrich Pollock, and many others. Frederick Grunfeld argues that
these people did not really experience anti-Semitism in pre-Nazi Germany.
Why? “All of these privileged witnesses … came from well-to-do families of the
upper middle class, for whom money had always been a talisman against the
cruder forms of prejudice.” [GRUNFELD, F., 1996, p. 17]

Although such people were from affluent families, socialism and communism
were often the world views they championed. “What today we are apt to
call Weimar culture,” notes Jewish scholar Werner Mosse, “was largely the creation
of left-wing intellectuals, among whom there was such a disproportionate
number of Jews that Weimar culture has been called, somewhat snidely, an
internal Jewish dialogue.” [MOSSE, W., 1985, p. 22] “In twentieth century Germany
where the Jews formed less than one percent of the nation’s population,”
observes Istvan Deak,
“Jews were responsible for a great part of German culture. The owners
of three of Germany’s greatest newspaper houses; the editors of the Vossiche
Zeitung and Berliner Tagleblatt; most book publishers; the owners
and editors of the Neue Rundschau and other distinguished literary mag
azines; the owners of Germany’s greatest art galleries were all Jews. Jews
played a major part in theatre and in the film industry as producers, directors,
and actors. Many of Germany’s best composers, musicians, artists,
sculptors, and architects were Jews. Their participation in literary
criticism and in literature were enormous: practically all the great critics
and many novelists, poets, dramatists, and essayists of the Weimar Republic
were Jews … If cultural contributions by Jews were far out of proportion
to their numerical strength, their participation in left-wing
intellectual activities were even more disproportionate.” [DEAK, p. 28]
By the 1920s German critics like Theodore Fritsch, Hans Blucher, and Adolf
Bartel were influential in the growing German complaint that German culture
was dominated by Jews. [TRAVERSO] A German Jew, Moritz Goldstein, had
poured fuel on the issue of Jewish dominance by writing a much-discussed article
in 1913 in which he wrote that Jews essentially ran German culture, from an
almost complete monopoly of Berlin newspapers and dominance of German theatre,
music, and literature. [LAQUER, p. 74] “German cultural life seems to be
passing increasingly into Jewish hands,” Goldstein wrote, “… We Jews are administering
the spiritual property of a nation which denies us our right and our ability
to do so.” [GRUNFELD, F., 1996, p. 21] Even in the nineteenth century the
German composer, and nationalist, Richard Wagner, was horrified to realize the
large number of Jews in his audiences, as well as in the receptions for him afterward.
[TRAVERSO, p. 12]

Although Jews, as 1% of the German population, represented a negligible
electoral power, by the early twentieth century their economic and social impact
was considerable in the political sphere. Jewish-funded lawyers, for instance, were
instrumental in securing fines against, or jail terms, for right wing politicians,
often for disorderly conduct charges or libel. [GINSBERG, B., 1993, p. 27] Even
“the police commissioner of Berlin during part of the period of Nazi agitation for
power was a Jew, Dr. Bernhard Weiss.” [GOLDBERG, M. H. 1979, p. 121] “In
1933,” says Anthony Heilbut, “[Jews] were only five hundred thousand of Germany’s
sixty-four million people, and one-third of these lived in Berlin. Jews had
infiltrated many areas of German life, particularly the media, through the newspapers
they owned and edited, as well as the movies they wrote and produced.”
[HEILBUT, p. 25] Before World War I, two of the most important German newspapers
– the National-Zeitung of Berlin and the Franfurter Zeitung – were owned
and edited by Jews. [GINSBERG, B., 1993, p. 25] 13 of 21 daily newspapers in Berlin
in the 1870’s were Jewish-owned, among them the only three that focused on
political satire. [GINSBERG, B., 1993, p. 25] In the pre-Nazi era of the Weimar
Republic, three of Germany’s important newspapers were Jewish-owned – the
Vossiche Zeitung, the Berliner Tageblatt (founded in 1872 by Rudolf Mosse and
Georg Davidsohn) and the Frankfurter Zeitung (Heinrich Simon/Leopold Sonnemann).
(The eventual president of the World Zionist Organization, Nahum
Goldmann, began writing for the Frankfurt paper when he was 15 years old).
[GOLDMANN, N., 1978, p. 16] The newspapers Grenzboten and Ostdeutsche
Post were also owned by a Jewish media mogul, Ignaz Kuranda. [ROTH, C., 1940,
p. 142] The two largest publishing houses in Germany – the Ullstein, and Mosse
companies – were also owned by Jews, as were a number of smaller ones. [GINSBERG,
B., 1993, p. 26] Rudolf Mosse, the founder of the Mosse company, and a
colleague also began “building up an advertising bureau which soon overtook the
former leaders, the English advertising agencies, and had 275 branches worldwide.”
[GIDAL, p. 272] In the late 1800s Leopold Ullstein “launched the Berliner
Morgenpost, which built up a circulation of six hundred thousand, the largest in
Germany, but perhaps his most dramatic breakthrough came with the Berliner
Illustrierte Zeitung which by 1894 had a circulation of two million … Ullstein had
five sons, all of whom developed different branches of his enterprise. By the ‘thirties
they were not only the biggest newspaper group in Germany, but they also
published books, magazines, dress patterns and music. They also had their own
news agency, picture service, film studio and even a zoo to serve their children’s
papers.” [BERMANT, C., 1977, p. 70]

The Jewish-owned Landhoffs book publishing firm was also a “book trade
dynasty,” [LOTTMAN, p. 51] as was the Springers company. “Not just the principals
of the [Springers] firm,” notes Business History, “but many of the distinguished
scientists among their authors and editors were Jewish.’ [SHAW, C.,
p. 214] Leading “avant-garde” publishing firms included the Jewish houses of
S. Fischer, Kurt Wolff, Georg Bondi, Erich Reiss, and the Malik Verlag.
[LAQUER, p. 73] “Bote and Bote was Germany’s largest music publisher and
ran a concert agency as well … Both Rutter and Loening in Frankfurt am Main
and the Deutsche Verlegsantalt in Stuttgart were founded by Jews, as were the
later publishing houses of Erich, Reiss, Brandus, and a number of specialist
presses.” [GIDAL, p. 35]

With the rise of German fascism, in 1933 a retired United States Department
official, Edward House, told a new ambassador to Berlin: “You should try
to ameliorate Jewish suffering. [The Nazis] are clearly wrong and even terrible,
but the Jews should not be allowed to dominate economic or intellectual life in
Berlin as they have for a long time.” [GROSE, p. 97-98] Anthony Heilbut notes
a joke that was a favorite of Albert Einstein’s, “in which an émigré asks a friend
if he is homesick for Berlin, and the other replies: ‘What for? I’m not Jewish.’”
[HEILBUT, p. 46]

Jews were also vastly over represented as editors and reporters in German
journalism. “Unfortunately,” says Sarah Gordon, “many of them tended to use
their works as vehicles to oppose or criticize prevalent German values.” [GORDON,
p. 14] Among these critics of German society was Kurt Tucholsky,
“whose biting satire made him a hero of the more cosmopolitan segments of
the German middle class. The son of a successful Jewish businessman-lawyer,
Tucholsky flayed Germans and German values mercilessly. By the late 1920s, he
had decided that Germany was hopeless and that middle-class Germans were
either idiots or positively evil.” [ROTHMAN/LICHTER, 1982, p. 85] Germans,
assessed prominent Jewish pianist Arthur Rubinstein in the 1930s, “are not a
musical people. They accept the heavy, pedantic music of Pfitzner, Reger and
Bruckner with their long-winded ‘developments,’ just as they enjoy a stodgy
meal of sauerkraut and sausages.” [SACHS, D., 1992, p. 21]

On one hand, Jews were increasingly perceived to have strangleholds on the
German social, cultural and economic system. On the other, in the political
field, Richard Rubenstein notes that
“Marxism was seen by conservative Europe as Jewish in origin and
leadership, a view that was reinforced in Germany by the three successive
left wing regimes that succeeded the Bavarian royal house of Wittelsbach
from November 7, 1918 to May 1, 1919, at the end of World
War I. In Munich, the city that did more than any other to give birth to
[Hitler’s] National Socialism, and in the era in which Hitler first joined
the miniscule party, a series of politically naive, left-wing Jewish leaders
attempted ineffectually to bring about an enduring socialist revolution
in Catholic, conservative Bavaria.” [RUBENSTEIN, p. 113]

“As Robert Michel pointed out in his classic Political Parties,” note Stanley
Rothman and S. Robert Lichter, “Jews at that time [late 1800s] were playing a key role in socialist parties
in almost every European country in which they had settled in any
numbers.” [ROTHMAN/LICHTER, 1982, p. 84]

In Germany, these included Daniel deLeon, a Sephardic Jew who headed the
Socialist Labor Party. DeLeon “attempted to conceal his Jewish background,
pretending that he was descended from an aristocratic family of Catholic background.”
[ROTHMAN/LICHTER, 1982, p. 95]

At the influential Die Weltbuhne left-wing intellectual journal in pre-Hitler
Germany, 42 of 68 writers “whose identity could be established” were found to
be of Jewish descent. Two more were “half-Jews” and three others were married
to Jewish women. But, notes Isak Deak, “only a few of the Weltbuhne circle
openly acknowledged that they were Jews … Die Weltbuhne was in this respect
not unique; Jews published, edited, and to a great part wrote the other left-wing
intellectual magazines … Jews created the left-wing intellectual movement in
Germany.” [DEAK, p. 24-25, 29]

In increasing political turmoil between World Wars I and II, and amidst the
rise of Nazism and a growing perception that the communist movement would
destroy tradition German culture and values, left-leaning Jewish politicians
who were assassinated included Bavarian premiere Kurt Eisner, Eugen Levin
(the chairman of the Executive Assembly of the Second Munich Soviet Republic),
and German Foreign Minister Walter Rathenau.

The actual origin of the term “anti-Semitism” is credited to German author
Wilhelm Marr who wrote, in 1879, a book entitled The Victory of Judaism Over
Germany. Here is a brief excerpt, as he agitated about so much Jewish dominance
in the life of German society:

“There is no stopping them ... Are there no clear signs that the twilight of
the Jews is setting in? No. Jewry’s control of society and politics, as well
as its practical domination of the religious and ecclestical thought, is still
in the prime of its development, heading toward the realization of Jehovah’s
promise, ‘I will hand all peoples over to thee.’ By now, a sudden reversal
of this process is fundamentally impossible, for if it were, the entire
social structure, which has been so thoroughly Judaized, would collapse.
And there is no viable alternative to this social structure which could take
its place. Further, we cannot count on the help of the ‘Christian’ state.
The Jews are the ‘best citizens’ of this modern, Christian state, as it is in
perfect harmony with their interests ... It is not a pretentious prophecy
but the deepest inner conviction which I here utter. Your generation will
not pass before there will be absolutely no public office, even the highest
one, which the Jews will not have usurped. Yes, through the Jewish nation,
Germany will become a world power, a western New Palestine. And
this will happen, not through violent revolutions, but through the compliance
of the people ...

German culture has proved itself ineffective and powerless against this
foreign power. This is a fact; a brute inexorable fact. State, Church, Catholicism,
Protestantism, Creed and Dogma, all are brought low before
the Jewish tribunal, that is, the [irreverent] daily press [which the Jews
control]. [Text in brackets inserted by Mendes-Flohr and Reinharz, presumably
from the context of the rest of the original Marr work] The Jews
were late in their assault on Germany, but once they started there was no
stopping them.” [MENDES-FOHR/REINHARZ, 1980, p. 271-273]

In nearby Austria, major newspapers like Neue Freie Presse (“the most prestigious
newspaper in Central Europe”) and Wiener Tagblatt were likewise
Jewish-owned. “In German-speaking Europe,” says Jacques Kornberg, “the
term ‘journalism’ and ‘Jews’ went together in people’s minds.” And, adds Kornberg,
since Jews had a reputation for “shady business practices” and “journalistic
corruption,” notions of “anti-Semitism and anti-journalism always went
hand in hand.” [KORNBERG; ROTH, C., 1940, p. 142]

In Vienna, Austria, by 1910, 62% of the lawyers were Jewish, 51% of the doctors
and dentists, and 70% of those in scientific occupations. [TRAVERSO,
p. 15] A large proportion of the rest of Viennese Jews, 40%, were merchants. A
Jewish writer from Berlin, Jakob Wasserman, in visiting Vienna in 1898,
remarked that
“I soon realized that the whole of public life was dominated by Jews…
I was amazed to see such a crowd of Jewish physicians, lawyers, clubs
men, snobs, dandies, proletarians, actors, journalists, and poets.”
[TRAVERSO, p. 28]
Jewish author Stephan Zweig claimed that nine-tenths of Viennese culture
was “promoted, nourished, or even created by Viennese Jewry.” [TRAVERSO,
p. 28] “The crowding of Jewish sons of well-to-do parents into the cultural
occupations was especially marked in Germany and Austria,” notes Hannah
Arendt, “where a great proportion of cultural institutions, like newspapers,
publishing, music, and theatre, became Jewish institutions.” [ARENDT, Origins,
p. 52] In the late nineteenth century, says Albert Lindemann, “that the
non-Jews [of Vienna] had a sense of being overwhelmed by a Jewish invasion is
… easy to understand, particularly because Jews tended to choose certain occupations
from which non-Jews were often consequently thrown out … Nearly all
the banks in the capital, and indeed in the Dual Monarchy as a whole, were
owned by Jews as were many of the most important newspapers, especially
those of mass circulation.” [LINDEMANN, p. 25] “Antisemitism,” once
observed Arthur Schnitzler, “became popular in Vienna ony when the Jews
themselves took it up.” [LEVY, A., 1993,p. 346]

From When Victims Rule, pp. 148-158

Editor's Note: After the controversy of World War II, the Zionists were able to recapture Germany and are presently in full control of their government...some would argue that they never left. I happen to agree with that conclusion.