The House of Rothschild and the Rise of International Finance

The most famous banking house in history and the enduring symbol of
international finance, investment banking, and trans-Jewish intrigue, the
House of Rothschild (HR) of Frankfurt, Germany, rose to economic power in
the nineteenth century, with branches throughout Europe. “The key aspect of
the HR operational strategy,” notes Sam Lehman-Wilzig, “was secrecy … The
extent to which [the Rothschilds] followed this strategy [of secrecy] bordered
on the incredible. To this day their records have not been made public.” [LEHMAN-
WILZIG, p. 254] “By the mid- [nineteenth] century,” writes Benjamin
Ginsberg, “the entire European state system was dependent upon the international
financial networks dominated by the Rothschilds.” [GINSBERG, B.,
1993, p. 18] “Instances occurred,” notes Howard Sachar, “in which the Rothschilds
demonstrably altered the course of international politics.” [SACHAR,
p. 137] Its quick reversal of political allegiance, national loyalties, and attendant
financing is noted by Hannah Arendt:
“It took the French Rothschilds in 1848 hardly twenty-four hours to
transfer their services from the government of Louis Philippe to the new
short-lived French Republic and again to Napoleon III.” [ARENDT,
p. 24]

The vast empire of the Rothschilds alone evoked growing non-Jewish
resentment. Arendt rhetorically wonders, “Where, indeed, was there better
proof of the fantastic concept of a world Jewish government than in this one
family, the Rothschilds, nationals of five different countries, prominent everywhere,
in close cooperation with at least three different governments (French,
Austrian, British), whose frequent conflicts never for a moment shook the solidarity
at interest of their state bankers? No propaganda could have created a
symbol more effective for political purposes than reality itself.” [SACHAR,
p. 136]

For many historians, the House of Rothschild is seminal in the examination
of the rise of international capitalism. The Rothschilds may be even understood
as the very prototype for the modern multinational corporation. “Considering
HR’s dual policy of economic expansion and aid to their Jewish brethren,” notes
Sam Lehman-Wilzig, “comparison to modern TNOs [transnational organizations]
are especially intriguing … [LEHMAN-WILZIG, p. 260] … In those territories
where the firm was already established, the [Rothschild] brothers used
their presence with its concomitant financial importance for the area as an
umbrella under which other Jews could be harmed only at risk of HR retribution.”
[LEHMAN-WILZIG, p. 255] “Along with love of business,” added Joel
Kotkin in 1993, “the Rothschilds [still] remain united by another, larger vocation,
one extending beyond business, family, and even nation – the vocation of
being Jews.” [KOTKIN, p. 16]

The Rothschild banking concerns, however, were far from the only ones.
Major Jewish investment banking organizations across Europe included those
of the Seligmans, Oppenheimers, Habers, Speyers, Warburgs, Mendelssohns,
Bleichroders, Eskeles, Arnsteins, Montagus, Goldsmids, Hambros, Sassoons,
and others. The Jewish international banking network that floated state loans
to finance European industry and railroads was wide: the five Rothschild brothers
were in London, Paris, Vienna, Frankfort, and Naples. The Bleichroders
were based in Berlin, the Warburgs in Hamburg, the Oppenheims in Cologne,
the Sassoons in Bombay, the Guenzburgs in St. Petersburg. Jews were also
influential in the creation of influential joint stock and commercial banks
including two of Germany’s largest – the Deutsche Bank and the Dresdner
Bank, as well as Crédit Mobilier, Banque de Paris, Banca Commerciale Italiana,
Credito Italiano, Creditanstalt-Bankverein, Banque de Bruxelles,
among others. [KREFETZ, p. 46]

“There was, by the end of the nineteenth century,” notes Chaim Bermant,
“hardly a financial centre where Jewish bankers did not enjoy a position of considerable
prominence. In Brussels there was the house of Bischoffsheim, and
also Errers, Oppenheim and Stern who combined with Sulzbach and May of
Frankfurt to form the Banque de Bruxelles, in 1821. In Switzerland Isaac Dreyfus
and Sons participated in the formation of the Basler Handelsbank and the
Basler Bankverein. In Holland there was Wertheimer and Gompertz and the
house of Lissa and Kann. The Hungarian General Credit Bank of Budapest was
of Jewish creation as were the Hungarian Commercial Bank and the Hungarian
Hypothecary Credit Bank. In St. Petersburg the Guenzburg families established
the Discount and Credit Bank as well as the Bank of St. Petersburg. The
Warsaw Discount Bank was founded in 1871 by Mieczystaw Epstein, and
Leopold Kronenberg took part in the formation of the Warsaw Credit Union as
well as the Bank Hadlowy; but it was London, until World War I the banking
capital of the world, which saw the largest concentration of Jewish financial talent
[Rothschilds, Hambros, Speyers, Erlangers, Cassels, Sassoons, Hirschs,
etc.].” [BERMANT, C., 1977, p. 40]

Louis Frankel was “one of the most important financiers in Sweden;” Isaac
Gluckstadt was “one of the most famous financiers in Denmark.” Maurice
Blank founded what became the “the second largest bank in Romania and the
largest privately owned bank in the country.” Ernest Cassel “established the
National Bank of Egypt.” [GREENBERG, M., p. 68-70] Maurice de Hirsch
“helped place the first Turkish loan in Paris in 1854 and had, jointly, with the
Ottoman bank, helped to establish the Crédit Général Ottoman in Constantinople,
both of which gave him invaluable Turkish contacts.” [BERMANT, C.,
1977, p. 43] “The first international bank [that] opened in Germany was
founded by a Marrano, Diego Teixera de Mattos in Hamburg … [By] the middle
of the eighteenth century … the Pintos, Delmontes, Bueno de Mesquita and
Francis Mels of Amsterdam were the leading financiers of northern Europe.”
[OSBORNE, S., 1939, p. 15]

In the United State, between 1840 and 1880, important Jewish banking
firms that developed included those of August Belmont, Goldman Sachs,
J.W. Seligman, Kuhn Loeb, Ladenburg Thalmann, Lazard Frères, Lehman
Brothers, Speyer, and Wertheim. “Jewish bankers,” notes Gerald Krefetz, “pro-
jected an image of concentrated power because they often acted in concert, collaborating on financial deals.” [KREFETZ, p. 47]


From the book When Victims Rule: A Critique of Jewish Preeminence in America , pp. 142-4.

Jewish Banking Network

These are a few of the major banking firms that control the international Money Power. They have profited tremendously from the World Wars, the major Revolutions, the Depressions and Recessions. In fact, they have been engineered by them. All wars are about the consolidation of Power and Money into the hands of the International Jewish bankers and their firms:

Rothschild Bank of London
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Lehman Brothers of New York
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Goldman-Sachs of New York
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York

All governments are subject to the international dominance of the Banking network. For example, Nathan Rothschild, now deceased said, “I care not what puppet sits on the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British empire, and I (through the Bank of England) control the British money supply."

This was no mere boast, this was (and is) an unmitigated fact. Even the past and present leaders of the United States knew who their Masters were (and are).

Jewish Dominance in the South African Diamond Trade

In South Africa, “nowhere in the world have Jews slipped so quickly into a
life of economic ease as here.” [LITVINOFF, p. 192] “The marketing of diamonds,”
says Mendel Kaplan, “at the outset through individual dealers and later
through the big diamond syndicates, was largely handled by Jews … the best of
them … afterwards made their mark in the gold industry.” [KAPLAN, p. 356]
Edmond de Rothschild had a significant investment in his predecessor in the
South African diamond trade, Cecil Rhodes. By 1770 Jews controlled four-fifths
of all diamonds imported from India and “over the years Jews have taken
leading positions at De Beers, which today controls roughly four-fifths of the
world’s output of unpolished diamonds.” [KOTKIN, p. 53] (The modern polished
diamond trade is largely located in the Jewish state). Beneficiaries of
apartheid, “South African Jews,” says African-American professor Tony Martin,
“were the world’s richest community and have become the world’s highest per
capita contributors to Israel.” [MARTIN, p. 74] Ernest Oppenheimer, who
became one of the richest men in the world, is called by Louis Hotz “one of the
chief architects of modern South Africa’s economy.” [FELDBERG, p. 57] Representing
about 4% of the “white population,” “there is hardly a branch of
South African industry in which Jewish men of enterprise and initiative have
not had some part.” [FELDBERG, p. 63] “The white status of the Jew [in apartheid
South Africa],” says Milton Shain, “was never seriously questioned or
threatened … The Anglo-German Jewish establishment enjoyed privilege,
power, authority, and even acclaim from earliest times, and the upward mobility
of the Eastern European Jew was patently obvious. The pariah was indeed
transformed into the parvenu.”

“In South Africa,” diplomatically noted South African civil rights activist
Desmund Tutu to a Jewish interviewer, “Jews in their success, especially as
industrialists and business people and as traders would be seen as people who
have benefited from the exploitation of Blacks, because the South African system
is a capitalist system which has tended to favor the strong and successful …
[HOFFMAN, p. 14] think there is a perception [among many South African
Blacks] that Jews are not entirely innocent. Most of us oppose capitalism,
because what we have experienced of capitalism tends to favor the privileged
and the strong and [it] seems to be exploitive.” [HOFFMAN, p. 14]


From the book When Victims Rule under the chapter entitled "Jewish Money and Economic Influence," pp. 159-160.

Zionist Logic as Expounded by Malcolm X

Zionist Logic -- Malcolm X on Zionism
Malcolm X (Omowale Malcolm X Shabazz)
Taken from The Egyptian Gazette -- Sept. 17, 1964

The Zionist armies that now occupy Palestine claim their ancient Jewish prophets predicted that in the "last days of this world" their own God would raise them up a "messiah" who would lead them to their promised land, and they would set up their own "divine" government in this newly-gained land, this "divine" government would enable them to "rule all other nations with a rod of iron."

If the Israeli Zionists believe their present occupation of Arab Palestine is the fulfillment of predictions made by their Jewish prophets, then they also religiously believe that Israel must fulfill its "divine" mission to rule all other nations with a rod of irons, which only means a different form of iron-like rule, more firmly entrenched even, than that of the former European Colonial Powers.

These Israeli Zionists religiously believe their Jewish God has chosen them to replace the outdated European colonialism with a new form of colonialism, so well disguised that it will enable them to deceive the African masses into submitting willingly to their "divine" authority and guidance, without the African masses being aware that they are still colonized.

CAMOUFLAGE

The Israeli Zionists are convinced they have successfully camouflaged their new kind of colonialism. Their colonialism appears to be more "benevolent," more "philanthropic," a system with which they rule simply by getting their potential victims to accept their friendly offers of economic "aid," and other tempting gifts, that they dangle in front of the newly-independent African nations, whose economies are experiencing great difficulties. During the 19th century, when the masses here in Africa were largely illiterate it was easy for European imperialists to rule them with "force and fear," but in this present era of enlightenment the African masses are awakening, and it is impossible to hold them in check now with the antiquated methods of the 19th century.

The imperialists, therefore, have been compelled to devise new methods. Since they can no longer force or frighten the masses into submission, they must devise modern methods that will enable them to maneuver the African masses into willing submission.

The modern 20th century weapon of neo-imperialism is "dollarism." The Zionists have mastered the science of dollarism: the ability to come posing as a friend and benefactor, bearing gifts and all other forms of economic aid and offers of technical assistance. Thus, the power and influence of Zionist Israel in many of the newly "independent" African nations has fast-become even more unshakeable than that of the 18th century European colonialists... and this new kind of Zionist colonialism differs only in form and method, but never in motive or objective.

At the close of the 19th century when European imperialists wisely foresaw that the awakening masses of Africa would not submit to their old method of ruling through force and fears, these ever-scheming imperialists had to create a "new weapon," and to find a "new base" for that weapon.

DOLLARISM

The number one weapon of 20th century imperialism is zionist dollarism, and one of the main bases for this weapon is Zionist Israel. The ever-scheming European imperialists wisely placed Israel where she could geographically divide the Arab world, infiltrate and sow the seed of dissension among African leaders and also divide the Africans against the Asians.

Zionist Israel's occupation of Arab Palestine has forced the Arab world to waste billions of precious dollars on armaments, making it impossible for these newly independent Arab nations to concentrate on strengthening the economies of their countries and elevate the living standard of their people.

And the continued low standard of living in the Arab world has been skillfully used by the Zionist propagandists to make it appear to the Africans that the Arab leaders are not intellectually or technically qualified to lift the living standard of their people ... thus, indirectly "enducing" Africans to turn away from the Arabs and towards the Israelis for teachers and technical assistance.

"They cripple the bird's wing, and then condemn it for not flying as fast as they." (emphasis added) The imperialists always make themselves look good, but it is only because they are competing against economically crippled newly independent countries whose economies are actually crippled by the Zionist-capitalist conspiracy. They can't stand against fair competition, thus they dread Gamal Abdul Nasser's call for African-Arab Unity under Socialism.

MESSIAH?

If the "religious" claim of the Zionists is true that they were to be led to the promised land by their messiah, and Israel's present occupation of Arab Palestine is the fulfillment of that prophesy: where is their messiah whom their prophets said would get the credit for leading them there? It was Ralph Bunche who "negotiated" the Zionists into possession of Occupied Palestine! Is Ralph Bunche the messiah of Zionism? If Ralph Bunche is not their messiah, and their messsiah has not yet come, then what are they doing in Palestine ahead of their messiah?

Did the Zionists have the legal or moral right to invade Arab Palestine, uproot its Arab citizens from their homes and seize all Arab property for themselves just based on the "religious" claim that their forefathers lived there thousands of years ago? Only a thousand years ago the Moors lived in Spain. Would this give the Moors of today the legal and moral right to invade the Iberian Peninsula, drive out its Spanish citizens, and then set up a new Moroccan nation ... where Spain used to be, as the European zionists have done to our Arab brothers and sisters in Palestine?...

In short the Zionist argument to justify Israel's present occupation of Arab Palestine has no intelligent or legal basis in history ... not even in their own religion. Where is their Messiah?

International Jewish Usury