Saturday, October 31, 2009

6 Million: A Kabbalistic Number


Ben Weintraub’s 1995 book, Holocaust Dogma Of Judaism, fully explores and explains the Kabalistic gematria and occultism involved in the number. 6,000,000 is the number of perfect souls times ten, and ten is number of the Sephiroth, the divine emanations of G_d as seen in the Kabala.

Thus, it is numerologically predetermined, and through various dark conjuring rites, supernaturally imbued with power. As a result, it can never, ever be changed. This is critical, central to the hex. 6,000,000 is the number. There are never more deaths; there are never less. 6,000,000 is the number. It must be ritually repeated and publicly acknowledged.

As we already see, 6,000,000 never refers to actual deaths. It is a purely symbolic, esoteric, mystical number, symbolizing the perfect result, a perfect creation, a magical Great Work in progress. Perhaps this is a part of tikkun olam, the Kabalistic-Talmudic “repairing” or “perfecting” of the world, done of course by the self-chosen ones.


The following are two quotes from unpublished sources whose content I have tried -- so far unsuccessfully -- to have verified by rabbinical scholars. I suspect that their ultimate source is the book The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism by Ben Weintraub, which is discussed HERE. The meaning of the second quote is made clearer if one understands something about Gematria, the Kabbalistic practice of interpreting texts by associating words and numbers. This material by itself does not prove the scriptural origins of the Six Million, but in combination with the fact that the number was used in other places (see below), this seems to clinch the case.

[Quote 1] Jewish prophecies in the Torah require that 6 million Jews must "vanish" before the state of Israel can be formed. "You shall return minus 6 million." That's why Tom Segev, an Israeli historian, declared that the "6 million" is an attempt to transform the Holocaust story into state religion. Those six million, according to prophecy, had to disappear in "burning ovens", which the judicial version of the Holocaust now authenticates. As a matter of fact, Robert B. Goldmann writes: ". . . without the Holocaust, there would be no Jewish State." A simple consequence: Given six million Jews gassed at Auschwitz who ended up in the "burning ovens" (the Greek word holocaust means burned offerings), therefore, the prophecies have now been "fulfilled" and Israel can become a "legitimate state". --Unknown

[Quote 2] Regarding the 'six million' number you should know the following: In the Hebrew text of the Torah prophesies, one can read "you shall return". In the text the letter "V" or "VAU" is absent, as Hebrew does not have any numbers; the letter V stands for the number 6. Ben Weintraub, a religious scientist, learned from rabbis that the meaning of the missing letter means the number is '6 million'. The prophesy then reads: You will return, but with 6 million less. See Ben Weintraub: "The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism", Cosmo Publishing, Washington 1995, page 3. The missing 6 million must be so before the Jews can return to the Promised Land. Jahweh sees this as a cleaning of the souls of the sinful people. The Jews must, on the return to the Promised Land, be clean -- the cleaning shall be done in burning stokes. --A Correspondent


The Sacred Nature of Six Million in the Judaic Religion

A fundamental constituent of Jewish mystical gnosis is the practice of 'Gematria', a type of numerology that assigns numerical value to the characters of the Hebrew alphabet. It involves the calculation of numerical equivalence and relationship between letters, words and phrases in order to find mystical insights and hidden teaching that Jews believe God planted into 'Torah'. Rabbi Harav Yitzchak Ginsburgh explains that: "Since the world was created through God's 'speech', each letter represents a different creative force."

Certain letters, and the corresponding numerical value, are considered in Judaism to have greater mystical power than others because of the frequency with which they are found in 'Torah'. One such value, the expression of which holds a predominant power in the Jewish psyche, is the Hebrew letter 'vav' which has a numerical value of six. As well as its obvious relationship to the six days of creation and the Jewish sabbath Rabbi Harav Yitzchak Ginsburgh reveals much of its esoteric connotation in his book The Alef-Beit: Jewish Thought Revealed Through the Hebrew Letters. For example, one learns that: "the consummate structure of six (as in the form of the Magen David [Star of David], the outer area of whose six 'wings' equals, and therefore folds onto, the area of its inner hexagon), reflected by the six orders of the Mishnah, finds its source in the dimensions of the Tablets given to Moses at Sinai. They were cubes measuring six handbreadths in each direction." A cube has six faces, of course.

The superstitious 'power' of 'six' in the Jewish mind can be found, for example, in the fact that the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington D.C. was purposely designed so that the display floors of photographs and artifacts of the Permanent Exhibition cover a space of 36,000 square feet. In 'Gematria' it is understood that this represents six thousand multiplied by six thousand. At the end of the tour the visitor enters the six thousand square foot Hall of Remembrance, which has six sides symbolising the six-pointed Star of David, and the six 'extermination' camps where 'Six Million' Jews were slaughtered. One can also find there a collection of six thousand children's hand-painted tiles. Yaffa Sonenson, a member of the U.S. Holocaust Commission donated, according to a sympathetic review of the museum penned by Barbara Beckwith for the online St. Anthony Messenger, a collection of six thousand photographs.

Jews Squealed About a "holocaust" of "6 Million" Jews in Romania, Poland and Ukraine in 1919 at end of WWI
Polish jew "testifies" before U.S. Congress in March 1945 of the "murder of 6,000,000Jews" by the Germans in Europe


Editor's Disclaimer: References to any source does not equivocate an endorsement by me.

Editor's Note: There are no 6 million origins in the word of YHVH which is the Torah, the Netuvim, and the Ketuvim. The "Torah" being referred to is the Talmud, Zohar, Tanya, and other Jewish esoteric books. This "Torah" is man-made. However, I do believe that the Hebrew of the Torah, the true Torah, has spiritual and gematric significance and value, as it bears witness to Jesus Christ. Reading the Old Testament in Hebrew, the original language, is an imcomparable experience.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

What Christians Don’t Know About Israel

By Grace Halsell

American Jews sympathetic to Israel dominate key positions in all areas of our government where decisions are made regarding the Middle East. This being the case, is there any hope of ever changing U.S. policy? American Presidents as well as most members of Congress support Israel -- and they know why. U.S. Jews sympathetic to Israel donate lavishly to their campaign coffers.
The answer to achieving an even-handed Middle East policy might lie elsewhere -- among those who support Israel but don't really know why. This group is the vast majority of Americans. They are well-meaning, fair-minded Christians who feel bonded to Israel -- and Zionism -- often from atavistic feelings, in some cases dating from childhood.

I am one of those. I grew up listening to stories of a mystical, allegorical, spiritual Israel. This was before a modern political entity with the same name appeared on our maps. I attended Sunday School and watched an instructor draw down window- type shades to show maps of the Holy Land. I imbibed stories of a Good and Chosen people who fought against their Bad "unChosen” enemies.

In my early 20s, I began traveling the world, earning my living as a writer. I came to the subject of the Middle East rather late in my career. I was sadly lacking in knowledge regarding the area. About all I knew was what I had learned in Sunday School.

And typical of many U.S. Christians, I somehow considered a modern state created in 1948 as a homeland for Jews persecuted under the Nazis as a replica of the spiritual, mystical Israel I heard about as a child. When in 1979 I initially went to Jerusalem, I planned to write about the three great monotheistic religions and leave out politics. “Not write about politics?” scoffed one Palestinian, smoking a waterpipe in the Old Walled City. “We eat politics, morning, noon and night!”
As I would learn, the politics is about land, and the co-claimants to that land: the indigenous Palestinians who have lived there for 2,000 years and the Jews who started arriving in large numbers after the Second World War. By living among Israeli Jews as well as Palestinian Christians and Muslims, I saw, heard, smelled, experienced the police state tactics Israelis use against Palestinians.

My research led to a book entitled Journey to Jerusalem. My journey not only was enlightening to me as regards Israel, but also I came to a deeper, and sadder, understanding of my own country. I say sadder understanding because I began to see that, in Middle East politics, we the people are not making the decisions, but rather that supporters of Israel are doing so. And typical of most Americans, I tended to think the U.S. media was “free” to print news impartially.
`It shouldn't be published. It's anti-Israel.’

In the late 1970s, when I first went to Jerusalem, I was unaware that editors could and would classify "news" depending on who was doing what to whom. On my initial visit to Israel-Palestine, I had interviewed dozens of young Palestinian men. About one in four related stories of torture.

Israeli police had come in the night, dragged them from their beds and placed hoods over their heads. Then in jails the Israelis had kept them in isolation, besieged them with loud, incessant noises, hung them upside down and had sadistically mutilated their genitals. I had not read such stories in the U.S. media. Wasn't it news? Obviously, I naively thought, U.S. editors simply didn't know it was happening.
On a trip to Washington, DC, I hand-delivered a letter to Frank Mankiewicz, then head of the public radio station WETA. I explained I had taped interviews with Palestinians who had been brutally tortured. And I'd make them available to him. I got no reply. I made several phone calls. Eventually I was put through to a public relations person, a Ms. Cohen, who said my letter had been lost. I wrote again. In time I began to realize what I hadn't known: had it been Jews who were strung up and tortured, it would be news. But interviews with tortured Arabs were “lost" at WETA.

The process of getting my book Journey to Jerusalem published also was a learning experience. Bill Griffin, who signed a contract with me on behalf of MacMillan Publishing Company, was a former Roman Catholic priest. He assured me that no one other than himself would edit the book. As I researched the book, making several trips to Israel and Palestine, I met frequently with Griffin, showing him sample chapters. “Terrific,” he said of my material.

The day the book was scheduled to be published, I went to visit MacMillan's. Checking in at a reception desk, I spotted Griffin across a room, cleaning out his desk. His secretary Margie came to greet me. In tears, she whispered for me to meet her in the ladies room. When we were alone, she confided, "He's been fired.” She indicated it was because he had signed a contract for a book that was sympathetic to Palestinians. Griffin, she said, had no time to see me.

Later, I met with another MacMillan official, William Curry. “I was told to take your manuscript to the Israeli Embassy, to let them read it for mistakes,” he told me. “They were not pleased. They asked me, “You are not going to publish this book, are you?” I asked, "Were there mistakes?” “Not mistakes as such. But it shouldn't be published. It's anti-Israel.”

Somehow, despite obstacles to prevent it, the presses had started rolling. After its publication in 1980, I was invited to speak in a number of churches. Christians generally reacted with disbelief. Back then, there was little or no coverage of Israeli land confiscation, demolition of Palestinian homes, wan ton arrests and torture of Palestinian civilians.

The Same Question

Speaking of these injustices, I invariably heard the same question, “How come I didn't know this?" Or someone might ask, "But I haven't read about that in my newspaper.” To these church audiences, I related my own learning experience, that of seeing hordes of U.S. correspondents covering a relatively tiny state. I pointed out that I had not seen so many reporters in world capitals such as Beijing, Moscow, London, Tokyo, Paris. Why, I asked, did a small state with a 1980 population of only four million warrant more reporters than China, with a billion people?

I also linked this query with my findings that The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post -- and most of our nation's print media - are owned and/or controlled by Jews supportive of Israel. It was for this reason, I deduced, that they sent so many reporters to cover Israel -- and to do so largely from the Israeli point of view.

My learning experiences also included coming to realize how easily I could lose a Jewish friend if I criticized the Jewish state. I could with impunity criticize France, England, Russia, even the United States. And any aspect of life in America. But not the Jewish state. I lost more Jewish friends than one after the publication of Journey to Jerusalem -- all sad losses for me and one, perhaps, saddest of all.
In the 1960s and 1970s, before going to the Middle East, I had written about the plight of blacks in a book entitled Soul Sister, and the plight of American Indians in a book entitled Bessie Yellowhair, and the problems endured by undocumented workers crossing from Mexico in The Illegals. These books had come to the attention of the “mother” of The New York Times, Mrs. Arthur Hays Sulzberger.

Her father had started the newspaper, then her husband ran it, and in the years that I knew her, her son was the publisher. She invited me to her fashionable apartment on Fifth Avenue for lunches and dinner parties. And, on many occasions, I was a weekend guest at her Greenwich, Conn., home.

She was liberal-minded and praised my efforts to speak for the underdog, even going so far in one letter to say, “You are the most remarkable woman I ever knew.” I had little concept that from being buoyed so high I could be dropped so suddenly when I discovered -- from her point of view -- the “wrong” underdog.

As it happened, I was a weekend guest in her spacious Connecticut home when she read bound galleys of Journey to Jerusalem. As I was leaving, she handed the galleys back with a saddened look: “My dear, have you forgotten the Holocaust?” She felt that what happened in Nazi Germany to Jews several decades earlier should silence any criticism of the Jewish state. She could focus on a holocaust of Jews while negating a modern day holocaust of Palestinians.

I realized, quite painfully, that our friendship was ending. Iphigene Sulzberger had not only invited me to her home to meet her famous friends but, also at her suggestion, The Times had requested articles. I wrote op-ed articles on various subjects including American blacks, American Indians as well as undocumented workers. Since Mrs. Sulzberger and other Jewish officials at the Times highly praised my efforts to help these groups of oppressed peoples, the dichotomy became apparent: most “liberal” U.S. Jews stand on the side of all poor and oppressed peoples save one -- the Palestinians.

How handily these liberal Jewish opinion-molders tend to diminish the Palestinians, to make them invisible, or to categorize them all as “terrorists.”

Interestingly, Iphigene Sulzberger had talked to me a great deal about her father, Adolph S. Ochs. She told me that he was not one of the early Zionists. He had not favored the creation of a Jewish state.

Yet, increasingly, American Jews have fallen victim to Zionism, a nationalistic movement that passes for many as a religion. While the ethical instructions of all great religions -- including the teachings of Moses, Muhammad and Christ -- stress that all human beings are equal, militant Zionists take the position that the killing of a non-Jew does not count.

Over five decades now, Zionists have killed Palestinians with impunity. And in the 1996 shelling of a U.N. base in Qana, Lebanon, the Israelis killed more than 100 civilians sheltered there. As an Israeli journalist, Arieh Shavit, explains of the massacre, “We believe with absolute certitude that right now, with the White House in our hands, the Senate in our hands and The New York Times in our hands, the lives of others do not count the same way as our own.”

Israelis today, explains the anti-Zionist Jew Israel Shahak, “are not basing their religion on the ethics of justice. They do not accept the Old Testament as it is written. Rather, religious Jews turn to the Talmud. For them, the Talmudic Jewish laws become “the Bible.” And the Talmud teaches that a Jew can kill a non-Jew with impunity.

In the teachings of Christ, there was a break from such Talmudic teachings. He sought to heal the wounded, to comfort the downtrodden.

The danger, of course, for U.S. Christians is that having made an icon of Israel, we fall into a trap of condoning whatever Israel does -- even wanton murder -- as orchestrated by God.

Yet, I am not alone in suggesting that the churches in the United States represent the last major organized support for Palestinian rights. This imperative is due in part to our historic links to the Land of Christ and in part to the moral issues involved with having our tax dollars fund Israeli-government-approved violations of human rights.

While Israel and its dedicated U.S. Jewish supporters know they have the president and most of Congress in their hands, they worry about grassroots America -- the well-meaning Christians who care for justice. Thus far, most Christians were unaware of what it was they didn't know about Israel. They were indoctrinated by U.S. supporters of Israel in their own country and when they traveled to the Land of Christ most all did so under Israeli sponsorship. That being the case, it was unlikely a Christian ever met a Palestinian or learned what caused the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

This is gradually changing, however. And this change disturbs the Israelis. As an example, delegates attending a Christian Sabeel conference in Bethlehem earlier this year said they were harassed by Israeli security at the Tel Aviv airport.

“They asked us,” said one delegate, “Why did you use a Palestinian travel agency? Why didn't you use an Israeli agency?” The interrogation was so extensive and hostile that Sabeel leaders called a special session to brief the delegates on how to handle the harassment. Obviously, said one delegate, “The Israelis have a policy to discourage us from visiting the Holy Land except under their sponsorship. They don't want Christians to start learning all they have never known about Israel.”

About the Author
Grace Halsell (1923-2000) was a distinguished American journalist, war correspondent, author and columnist. She was the author of 13 books, including Journey to Jerusalem and Prophecy and Politics.

Source: Institute for Historical Review

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

The Power of Symbols

By Patrick Grimm

What are you reading now? Words. What are words? Words are one thing. They are symbols, symbols that when pieced together represent, but only partially explain concepts, ideas, feelings etc.

It is obvious by their hysteria over the internet and so-called "hate speech" that Zionists fear our words. But why? They fear the words of their opponents and enemies because they are symbols pieced together in such a way that they shake the very delicate ground which the Zionists stand upon and bring their entire fragile edifice of lies tumbling down, much like the circulating air induced by a fan collapses a house of cards. All the letters of the alphabet can be jumbled into literally hundreds of millions of different patterns. We must choose to use our symbols wisely, but always liberally to convey what reads like truth to a true truthseeker. I say "reads like truth" because the symbols are only ciphers on a page. The ideas that they spell out or "symbolize" if you will, are more ethereal. They are bigger than even words can convey.

As you read Zionist Watch, grow to believe in the power of symbols, in the power of words. How important are these symbolic constructions called "words"? Proverbs 25:11 sums it up best. “A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in frames of silver.”

Originally written: 3/4/07

Editor's Note: Interestingly enough, removed Mr. Grimm's blog from their server for an alleged violation of their terms of use:

Monday, October 26, 2009

What are the Seven Noachide Laws?

Editor's Note: There is no indication in the Tanach (Old Testament Scriptures) of God giving Noah any kind of laws. Noah was a preacher of righteousness who obeyed God and built the Ark in obedience to the revelation of God's imminent judgment against the wicked. There were no Hebrews (or Jews) in Noah's time. Noah was declared righteous by faith in the word of God and by virtue of his faith became the progenitor of the human race after the flood. Adam's race was completely wiped out. The Noachide laws are the complete demented fabrication of reprobate and disillusioned minds.

Chabad Lubavitch Speaks:

The Seven Noahide Laws
To the Jewish people G-d gave the entire Torah [teaching] as their Law. They therefore have a special responsibility—with special commandments—to be the priesthood of the world, a "light unto the nations."

What about the rest of the world? What is G-d's will for them?

G-d gave Noah and all his descendants (B'nei Noach or "children of Noah") seven commandments to obey. These seven universal laws (known as the "Seven Noahide Laws") were reaffirmed with Moses and the Jewish people at Mt. Sinai in what is now known as the Oral Torah, establishing modern observance of these laws. These seven commandments (mitzvos), actually seven categories of hundreds of specific laws, are G-d's will for all non-Jews.

Non-Jews who (1) reject all idolatrous ideas and accept the kingship of the One G-d, (2) accept the priesthood of the Jewish people as the guardians and teachers of Torah, and (3) commit to following the Seven Noahide Laws as revealed in the Oral Torah from Mt. Sinai are "Hasidic Gentiles" or "Noahides." The term "Hasidic Gentile" is derived from a classic commentary by the Rambam, Rav Moshe ben Maimon (Maimonides), in The Laws of Kings 8:11:

"Anyone who accepts upon himself the fulfillment of these Seven Mitzvos [commandments] and is precise in their observance is considered one of the hasidei umos ha'olam ["Hasidim of the nations of the world"] and will merit a share in the World to Come."
The Seven Noahide Laws are the minimal observance for non-Jews. The source of these laws and the basis of their understanding is the Oral Torah, which G-d gave to the Jewish people at Mount Sinai along with His Written Law. By learning from the Jews and performing the mitzvos, non-Jews have a crucial role in G-d's Creation.

The Seven Noahide Laws actually encompass numerous details and applications within hundreds of laws, each with specific applications. One should also keep in mind that these laws are only the minimal basis for a Hasidic gentile's service to G-d, since there are many Jewish mitzvos that non-Jews are encouraged to adopt to accomplish more. Through these laws a gentile refines himself and the Creation as a whole, fulfilling his purpose for existence.

For a detailed listing of the Noahide Laws, visit our sister site Hasidic University.

U.S. Congressman Bill Dannemeyer (1979-1992) Explains:

The Encyclopedia of Judaism describes The Noachide Laws (the words Noahide and Noachide are used interchangeably) as follows:

The Noachide Laws – The Encyclopedia of Judaism

1.Civil justice [the duty to establish a legal system];
2.Prohibition of blasphemy [which includes the bearing of false witness];
3.The abandonment of idolatry;
4.The prohibition of incest [including adultery and other sexual offenses];
5.The prohibition of murder;
6.Also that of theft;
7.The law against eating flesh [a limb] cut from a living animal [ie., cruelty in any shape or form] (Babylonian Talmud. Sanh. 56A)
Before providing answers to the other six questions, I would like to describe my analysis of the process by which this Resolution was adopted by Congress.

When you initially read HJ Res. 104, it seems to be a vehicle for recognizing the eighty-ninth birthday and the beginning of the 90th year of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson which fell on March 26, 1991. I have no recollection of anyone asking me to co-sponsor this Resolution so I am not familiar with what reasons were given to House of Representative members to sign on as co-sponsors.

The language of the Resolution speaks for itself. But the consequences of their adoption is that the Seven Noahide Laws have been recognized by the Congress of the United States and the President of America as “the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization” and the claim will be made that they are now the law of our land, the United States. Most Americans would be shocked to learn that the Babylonian Talmud, NOT the Old Testament, is the “Holiest” book of Judaism, and is the source of these Seven Noahide Laws, which provide a specific penalty for violating any of these Seven Noahide Laws, namely death by decapitation [Sanhedrin 57A]

Make no mistake about it, what appeared to be nothing more than a recognition of the eighty-ninth birthday of Rabbi Schneerson and the establishment of Education Day in the United States will be claimed by the proponents of this Resolution as the establishment of a law by which a Christian who worships Jesus Christ will be charged with idolatry and decapitated.

Based on my fourteen years of service in the House of Representatives, the process by which HJ Res. 104 was adopted was a complete disregard and purposeful circumvention of a very important basis on which representative government is founded. Namely, accountability to the people of America of how we conduct the people’s business. Specifically, roll call votes are the means whereby members of Congress identify what laws have been passed and by whom. When laws and resolutions pass by unanimous consent, watch out! In this case someone or some group wanted to hide the real purpose behind a seemingly innocuous birthday recognition of Rabbi Schneerson.

I was not part of the discussion that led to the drafting and presentation of HJ Res. 104, to members of Congress. But based on my knowledge of how Congress works, this describes what most probably took place.

Jews, who by their financial contributions to members of Congress, claim they control what Congress will or will not do. A look at the recent history of U.S. politics confirms this. “He who has the gold – rules!”

Stephen Sizer, author of the book, Christian Zionism, first published in 2004, states:

“The Unity Coalition for Israel (UCFI) is probably the most recent network of Christian Zionists to be formed in the US yet it is already the largest and most powerful. The UCFI was founded by Esther Levens, a Jew, in Kansas in 1994 and now comprises a broad coalition of 200 different and autonomous Jewish and Christian organizations representing 40 million members who are ‘dedicated to a secure Israel’. Their principal strategy is to lobby the US media and political establishment, to challenge what they term ‘disinformation and propaganda’ and to express ‘the truth about Israel’. The UCFI includes three of the largest Christian Zionist organizations: Bridges for Peace, the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, and Christians for Israel.

This coalition has a major influence on both the Republican and Democratic parties by providing the bulk of campaign funding to both sides. Aluf Ben, a spokesman for Shimon Peres, was quoted in Ha’aretz, a leading newspaper in Israel, as claiming that sixty percent of all financial help to Democrats came from Jewish sources.’ According to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, ‘most pro-Israel fund-raisers estimate that at least 60 to 90 percent of Democratic campaign funding comes from Jewish sources, which also supply perhaps 40 percent of Republican funding’. Christian Zionists have also been influential in forging a closer relationship with Israel by facilitating solidarity pilgrimages and educational tours to the Holy Land.” (page 215)

Jewish lobbyists were successful in enlisting Minority Leader, Congressman Bob Michael, to be the chief sponsor of this resolution purportedly to honor and recognize Rabbi Schneerson, the leader of the Lubaviteh movement, on his eighty-ninth birthday.

These lobbyists wanted to eliminate, for obvious reasons, any chance for discussion of the seven questions written above in this report. Specifically, the Bible, with particular reference in this instance to the Ten Commandments written by God, is the source of the ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society, not the Seven Noahide Laws, written by man.

To avoid this debate and the recorded vote that would have followed, a strategy was devised to get Resolution 104 adopted by “unanimous consent” with no documentation that 99% of all House members were absent, and none of the four members that were present would be held accountable by a recorded vote.

The Journal of the House of Representatives (JHR) for March 5, 1991, on page 151, describes item 30.12 H Res. 95- Unfinished Business. This Resolution commended the President and United States and allied military forces in the success of Operation Desert Storm. A recorded vote was taken and Item 30.13 describes the count: Yeas 410, Nays 8. My yes vote was among the 410. This page contains the name of each member present and how he or she voted.

Item 30.14, on the next page (page 152) of the JHR, recorded the announcement that when the House adjourns, it will meet on Wednesday, March 6, at 12 noon. This told all the members that there would be no more roll call votes on Tuesday, March 5, that the day’s business was over, and within minutes after this announcement, virtually all the members were off the House floor, on their way home, and totally unaware of anything thereafter that was brought up.

Here is the subsequent record of what took place AFTER the members were gone. Item 30.15 of the JHR was a routine announcement concerning recesses and a joint session with the President of the United States:

But then after almost everyone was gone for the day, Item 30.16 on the agenda, HJ Res. 104, the Resolution in question, was surreptiously brought up on the House floor with only four members present, who spoke on behalf of the Resolution. This is how it occurred:

Congressman Thomas Sawyer (D-OH), the Chairman of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service asked for “unanimous consent” to take up HJ Res. 104. Congressman Thomas Ridge (R-PA) reserved the right to object, but did not object. If he had objected, it would have stopped the process of unanimous consent. Instead, he acknowledged the work of Minority Leader Michel who was the chief sponsor of this legislation and he then yielded to (Jewish) Congressman Benjamin Gilman (R-NY). Congressman Gilman spoke briefly as did Minority Leader Michel. It appears likely that these four Congressmen were the only ones present.

After assisting with the underhanded passage of HJ Res. 104, Congressman Thomas Ridge also subsequently assisted in the cover up of the truth of 9/11, claiming that flight #93 crashed in Pennsylvania, even though NO parts of an airplane or passengers or baggage were ever found. From then on Thomas Ridge’s career blossomed! At the time of 9/11, Ridge was Governor of Pennsylvania (1995-2001). But in 2003, Ridge was named the First Secretary of the new Department of Homeland Security (2003-2005). After the tragic multiple shootings at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007, Ridge became part of the committee to cover up what actually happened in that event.

Continuing with the debacle of the “Noahide Laws” passage, the Speaker pro tempore asked if there was any objection to the request from Congressman Sawyer. There was no objection.

On motion of Mr. Sawyer, by unanimous consent, the Committee on Post Office and Civil service was discharged from further consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) to designate March 26, 1991, as “Education Day, U.S. A.”
When said joint resolution was considered, read twice, ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, was read a third time by title, and passed.
A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said joint resolution was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said joint resolution.

Their total remarks consumed no more than four or five minutes and there was not even a mention of the Seven Noahide Laws. For the balance of the early evening these routine non-controversial items were considered by the “House” with only these four members present.

Item 30.17 National Employ the Older Worker Week
Item 30.18 Baltic Foreeda day
Item 30.19 Leave of Absence
Item 30.20 Adjournment

The Jews claim that with their financial contributions they have bought control of the U.S. Congress, and so they have. As proof of this statement no one needs to search further than the blunt words of Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, uttered on October 3, 2001 to his colleague, Shimon Peres:

“Every time we do something, you tell me America will do this and will do that…I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”

Indeed, the Jews had “bought” control of the House and Senate which resulted in ignoring the whole concept of accountability that the presence of debate and a roll call vote accomplishes. Bringing up HJ Res. 104 for passage at a time when the process selected assured that no more than four members of the House of Representatives were present, each of whom was committed to the passage of HJ Res. 104, guaranteed that when the request for unanimous consent was expressed on the floor of the House, no one was around to object. And because no one objected, passage was obtained with no member having his or her vote recorded in favor of or against the Resolution. By design there was no roll call vote and thus no member was held accountable for what Congress did. This is a prime example of the fraud perpetrated on the American people by their so-called “Representatives.” The oft quoted cliché is operating here, “With friends like these, who needs enemies?”


Sunday, October 25, 2009

Who are the Chabad Lubavitchers?

Photo: New York Times

Biographical information written by Carol A. Valentine, President, Public Action, Inc.; May 15, 2002
Title Provided by the Editor

We can argue about who is most to blame, but the facts remain the same: Congress and the White House have been helping to establish a theocracy in America. That's right, in America -- the nation that used to be a land of religious freedom.

The would-be leaders of new theocracy:

•Want to abolish Christmas,
•Call Christians "idol worshippers,"
•Demand Christians give up their religion or be put to death,
•Preach that Jesus practiced sorcery, worshipped stone idols, and was sexually immoral,
•Want to establish a caste system in the US based on heredity and religion,
•Want to force US citizens to embrace a synthesized "religion" invented for a servant class.
And now, since the advent of the 9-11 war, the would-be leaders of this theocracy are stronger than ever. Little stands between them and the realization of their plans.

This may sound incredible, but it is as real as the ground beneath your feet, and as serious as a heart attack. I can document everything I have said. Let me fill you in on the details.

The would-be theocratic leaders that Congress and our presidents have been promoting are members of a sect called Chabad Lubavitch, headquartered in Brooklyn, New York. Chabad, (sometimes spelled "Habad"), is an acronym for three Hebrew words: Chochma, Binah and Daas, which mean "wisdom, understanding and knowledge." Chabad and Lubavitch are functionally synonymous. Chabad describes the movement; Lubavitch is the name of the town (sometimes said to be in Lithuania, sometimes in Russia) where the movement was headquartered during the nineteenth century.

Lubavitchers are a subset of the Hasidic (sometimes spelled "Chasidic") Jews. Doctrinally, Hasidic Jews rely on the Talmud, on the Zohar (the basic book of kabbalah or "calabah"), and on the Tanya (or "Hatanya") written by the founder of the Chabad Lubavitch Hasidics, Rabbi Shneur Zalman. [See Footnote 1 .]

The Chabad Lubavitchers also rely on the works of renowned Jewish teachers such as Maimonides. Of course they rely on the Torah; but note that the word "Torah," in Jewish religious discourse, is somewhat elastic; it can denote (1) the Pentateuch (the first five books of the Old Testament), (2) the Old Testament in its entirety, (3) the Old Testament in its entirety, and the Talmud, and (4) the entire body of Jewish religious literature.

Reviewing the above, we can see that, doctrinally, Lubavitchers are not an aberration within Judaism. They are as much part of Judaism as the Dominicans are part of the Roman Catholic Church. It would be misleading to call the Lubavitch movement a "cult" as some have done, without so naming mainstream Orthodox Judaism.

For contemporary Lubavitchers, the most admired is late Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the "Lubavitcher Rebbe," or simply "the Rebbe." (Jewish people call a rabbi with whom they have a close and personal relationship their "Rebbe." Since I feel as though I have a close and personal relationship with him -- having read much about him -- and since I am not Jewish, I will use the Americanized form of the word and call Rabbi Schneerson "the Reeb." )

Some Lubavitchers consider the Reeb their Messiah and await for him to return from the dead; other say that the Messiah is really the Jewish people themselves. If all that is beginning to sound weird and fringy, realize that the Lubavitchers do not confine themselves to Brooklyn, New York. They have immediate and constant access to the President of the United States: George Bush's Press Secretary, Ari Fleischer, a Reform Jew, works the Lubavitcher mission.

The most prominent backer of the Lubavitchers on Capitol Hill is Senator Joseph Lieberman (D.Conn.), an Orthodox Jew, and the former candidate for the Vice-Presidency of the United States. The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), has commended Chabad Lubavitch "ideals" in a Senate floor statement. Jewish members of Congress regularly attend seminars conducted by a Washington DC Lubavitcher rabbi. The Assistant Secretary of Defense, Paul D. Wolfowitz, the Comptroller of the US Department of Defense, Dov Zakheim (an ordained Orthodox rabbi), and Stuart Eizenstat, former Deputy Treasury Secretary, are all Lubavitcher groupies.

According to the Jerusalem Post of October 19, 2001, "Chabad is a potent force: 2,600institutions around the world, large numbers of English-speaking rabbis, control of most of Judaism in Italy as well as the chief rabbinate of Russia (its Russia budget alone is $20 million a year). It is an organization with immense world-wide financial resources . . . In fact, Chabad is a movement of monumental importance. Observant Jews are profoundly dependent on its emissaries all over the world . . . its rabbis dominate or are poised to dominate Jewish communities in a startling number of countries."
mirrored at:
original article at:

The Jewish Virtual Library tells a similar story: "More than 3,700 emissary couples work in more than 100 countries worldwide. Since 1995, more than 400 shlichim (emissaries) were assigned to new posts and more than 500 new Chabad institution [sic] have been established, bringing the total to nearly 2,600 institutions (seminaries, day camps, schools, etc) worldwide. According to headquarters, almost one million children participates [sic] in Chabad activities worldwide in 1999."
mirrored at:

The Lubavitchers are proselytizers, but of a different sort. They want to make all Jews -- Reform, Conservative or Orthodox --hyper "Jewish." Thus we see Orthodox Jews like Lieberman and Reform Jews like Fleischer standing side-by-side working the Lubavitcher program. Lubavitchers don't want to convert non-Jews to Judaism -- they want Jews to understand they are a class apart from everyone else.

In a letter he wrote in 1964, Schneerson deplored intermarriage of Jews with non-Jews, calling it "spiritual cremation," and called the concepts of freedom, equality, and integration "misconceived ideals."
mirrored at:

This is particularly amusing, inasmuch as in the Jews led the movement to forcibly integrate the South which resulted in the 1964 Civil Rights Act. (Editor's Note: The Jews hijacked the Black Civil Rights Movement to suit their own ends. This is thoroughly documented fact.) The Religious Action Center for Reform Judaism tells us that "During the Mississippi Summer of 1964, Jews made up half of the young people who volunteered in the effort to end segregation."

Obviously, integration and mixed marriages are for the Gentiles, not the Jews.

Editor's Note: So why in the world are we honoring a man who is supposed to be an image of diversity and tolernace?


Saturday, October 24, 2009

Who was Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson?

Rabbi Menachem Schneerson was a real Old Testament Jew, a Talmud Jew, who preached the unadulterated doctrines of the Talmud, including the doctrine of Jewish superiority and the doctrine that the Jews are really the chosen people of God,
ordained to rule all the other nations of the world and own all their possessions.

His sermons have been published, although you’re not likely to find them in any mainstream libraries. But I can quote at least a little bit, just to give you the flavor.

The Lubavitcher “Rebbe” preached, describing the difference between Jews and non-Jews, for example, like this: “The body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of a member of any other nation of the world.... The Jewish body looks as if in substance it were similar to the bodies of non-Jews, but ... the bodies only seem to be similar in material substance, outward look, and superficial quality. The difference of the inner quality, however, is so great that the bodies should be considered as completely different species. This is the reason why the Talmud states that there is a halachic difference in attitude about the bodies of non-Jews.... Their bodies are in vain ... An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist. A non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul comes from holiness.” [Israel Shahak and Norman Mezvinsky, Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel (Pluto Press, London, 1999), p. 59-60]

Schneerson was also an advocate of the slaughter of Palestinians, thus making him a murderer. The Reeb demanded the Middle East peace process must be "defeated." Allan Brownfeld Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, March 2000 says:

Rabbi Schneerson always supported Israeli wars and opposed any retreat. In 1974 he strongly opposed the Israeli withdrawal from the Suez area. He promised Israel divine favors if it persisted in occupying the land. After his death, thousands of his Israeli followers played an important role in the election victory of Binyamin Netanyahu. (Netanyahu has been re-elected; selected to another term as Israeli Prime Minister) Among the religious settlers in the occupied territories, the Chabad Hassids constitute one of the most extreme groups. Baruch Goldstein, the mass murderer of Palestinians, was one of them.

Editor's Note: The Chabad Lubavaitch Jews purport to be the "Son of God":, mirrored at: The Jews are its own Messiah. Here is the warped rationale of Chabad: "In the book of Exodus, G-d openly proclaims His son to the world: 'Thus says the L-rd: My firstborn son is Israel' (4). 'Israel' is the Jewish people—all of them. The Jews were chosen by G-d to be His special 'son,' to be, in the words of the Bible, 'a kingdom of priests and a holy nation' for the whole world (5)." The passages referred to are Exodus 4:22 and Exodus 19:6. According to Christian exegesis, however, of the allegorical school of thought, Israel is ultimately Christ. Israel, in the natural, was to be a servant people unto Hashem (God) and be light of the revelation of His Son to the nations. I hold to this allegorical Christian view. The "Chabads" are sloppy Hebraists and corrupt expositors of the Tanach.

Education Day: The Greatest Coup Ever

Editor's Note: On March 26, 1991, the Senate and the House of Representatives inadvertantly signed our lives away to Judaic tyranny in commemorating a racist (among other things) as a model of character and decency. The Lubavitcher Rebbe Schneerson was a false messiah and prophet who advocated a so-called "Gentile" subservience to the Jewish Noachide laws, which are laws relegating the nations to perpetual bondage to their Khazarian Masters.

As I mentioned in yesterday's post the U.S. Constitution is dead in light of what was is contained in H.J.Res.104, describing the Noachide laws as the "ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded." So much for the "America is a Christian Nation" myth! The Founding Fathers were Masons anyway. For Jefferson to cut and paste his own Bible is Masonic in nature and practice. This bill is provided for the reader below. Read and weep, for we are in an age of mourning.

One Hundred Second Congress of the United States of America
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, the third day of January,
one thousand nine hundred and ninety-one
Joint Resolution

To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.
Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;
Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;
Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;
Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;
Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;
Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world;
Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;
Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, `the rebbe', this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of `education and giving', the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and
Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as `Education Day, U.S.A.'. The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.

Source: The Library of Congress

Friday, October 23, 2009

Hate crimes bill goes to Obama for signature

Editor's Note: This Hate Crime Bill that is positioned to be signed into law troubles me. On the surface, the bill appears to be protecting homosexuals against violence. I am no homophobe nor do I advocate violence against anyone because of their sexual or religious preference. However, what I am concerned about are the deeper implications of this bill. Will criticism of homosexuals be considered hate? Will these same stipulations cross over to other groups, as well. For example, will the critique of international Zionism become a hate crime in America, punishable by imprisonment or possibly death? The way things are headed this could become the case. With the Constitution already obsolete and with the Noachide laws* being deemed the foundational bedrock of the United States of America, I fear for the future of our country, for her destruction is imminent. Welcome to the Judaization of America.

*Education Day was adopted by our nation's Presidents to honor the Chabad Rebbe and Jewish supremacist Menachem Mendel Schneerson(1902-1994). Rabbi Schneerson was not very fond of the goyim. He considered the non-Jews to be of a different biological constitution than the Jews. In his warped mind, he considered the Gentile to be no more than an animal. This runs contrary to the Torah, Prophets, and Writings.

President George W. Bush wrote in his proclamation on Education and Sharing Day 2007:

"Education and Sharing Day honors the legacy of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson and emphasizes our commitment to teach the next generation of Americans the values that make our country strong. The Lubavitcher Rabbi believed that society should 'make a new commitment to kindness,' and he helped to establish education and outreach centers offering social service programs and humanitarian aid around the world."

President Barack H. Obama wrote in his proclation on Education & Sharing Day 2009:

"Few have better understood or more successfully promoted these ideas than Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, who emphasized the importance of education and good character. Through the establishment of educational and social service institutions across the country and the world, Rabbi Schneerson sought to empower young people and inspire individuals of all ages. On this day, we raise his call anew."

The 1991 bill described the Noahide Laws as the "ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded".

This bill was "Enrolled as Agreed to and or Passed by Both House and Senate" on March 26, 1991. March 26, 1991 was the great coup d'etat of American sovereignty by the Jews, leaving Christians as the ultimate target.
Source: Wikipedia with appropriate links.

...and now I leave you with the Hate Crime article. Pardon my verbosity but as a student of history I've discovered that context is everything.

updated 4:41 a.m. EDT, Fri October 23, 2009

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Senate passed groundbreaking legislation Thursday that would make it a federal crime to assault an individual because of his or her sexual orientation or gender identity.

The expanded federal hate crimes law now goes to President Obama's desk. Obama has pledged to sign the measure, which was added to a $680 billion defense authorization bill.

President George W. Bush had threatened to veto a similar measure.

The bill is named for Matthew Shepard, a gay Wyoming teenager who died after being kidnapped and severely beaten in October 1998, and James Byrd Jr., an African-American man dragged to death in Texas the same year.

"Knowing that the president will sign it, unlike his predecessor, has made all the hard work this year to pass it worthwhile," said Judy Shepard, board president of the Matthew Shepard Foundation named for her son. "Hate crimes continue to affect far too many Americans who are simply trying to live their lives honestly, and they need to know that their government will protect them from violence, and provide appropriate justice for victims and their families."

Several religious groups have expressed concern that a hate-crimes law could be used to criminalize conservative speech relating to subjects such as abortion or homosexuality.

Attorney General Eric Holder has asserted that any federal hate-crimes law would be used only to prosecute violent acts based on bias, as opposed to the prosecution of speech based on controversial racial or religious beliefs.

Holder called Thursday's 68-29 Senate vote to approve the defense spending bill that included the hate crimes measure "a milestone in helping protect Americans from the most heinous bias-motivated violence." Watch survivor of attack discuss legislation »

"The passage of this legislation will give the Justice Department and our state and local law enforcement partners the tools we need to deter and prosecute these acts of violence," he said in a statement.

Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, called the measure "our nation's first major piece of civil rights legislation for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people."

"Too many in our community have been devastated by hate violence," Solmonese said in a statement. "We now can begin the important steps to erasing hate in our country."

This month, Obama told the Human Rights Campaign, the country's largest gay rights group, that the nation still needs to make significant changes to ensure equal rights for gays and lesbians.

"Despite the progress we've made, there are still laws to change and hearts to open," he said during his address at the dinner for the Human Rights Campaign. "This fight continues now, and I'm here with the simple message: I'm here with you in that fight."

Among other things, Obama has called for the repeal of the ban on gays serving openly in the military, the "don't ask, don't tell" policy. He also has urged Congress to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and pass the Domestic Partners Benefit and Obligations Act.

The Defense of Marriage Act defines marriage, for federal purposes, as a legal union between a man and a woman. It allows states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages. The Domestic Partners Benefit and Obligations Act would extend family benefits now available to heterosexual federal employees to gay and lesbian federal workers.

More than 77,000 hate-crime incidents were reported by the FBI between 1998 and 2007, or "nearly one hate crime for every hour of every day over the span of a decade," Holder told the Senate Judiciary Committee in June.

The FBI, Holder added, reported 7,624 hate-crime incidents in 2007, the most current year with complete data.

© 2009 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Italian Professor who doubts Auschwitz gassings faces legal action

Editor's Note: It is appalling how every issue under the sun can be discussed but this one issue in academic and scholarly circles. This issue seems to evade all empirical scrutiny, while the very existence of Christ is undermined relentlessly by the Zionist-controlled media. It is rather interesting that the Holocaust has replaced the crucifixion of Christ as the greatest crime in history. And by the way, how is it possible that the Judaized Khazars have a corner on suffering? Revisionists do not deny the suffering of Eastern European Jewry during WWII. What they call into question are the alleged gas chambers, the sacred six million number of Jews killed, the alleged Nazi extermination program, and other important aspects of the Holocaust that should endure intellectual scrutiny as all other subjects. Jesus Christ denial is fine, just don't deny the new world order religion of Holocaustolatry.

Italy: Holocaust-denying academic sparks row

Rome, 23 October 2009 (AKI) - The Holocaust-denying views of an Italian
academic at the University of Rome 'La Sapienza,' Antonio Caracciolo,
has sparked calls for him to resign. The 59-year-old philosophy of law
researcher's blogs have described the World War II Nazi Holocaust - or
extermination of six million Jews - as "a legend" and claim the gas
chambers "are one of many 'truths' which need to be verified."

The head of Rome's Jewish community, Riccardo Pacifici, said it will
take legal action against the academic. "We are waiting for the
university to take measures to protect students and will certainly be
taking action against Caracciolo," Pacifici said. "We are confident the
university won't be the only institution to act and that the whole of
civil society will react."

In 2007, Italy's previous center-left government, headed by Romano
Prodi, passed a law making Holocaust-denial a crime.

The rector of 'La Sapienza', Luigi Frati has announced the university
"will consider taking disciplinary action" against Caracciolo, without
giving any further details. "He would do well to visit Dachau, which I
visited when I was 16, or if he can't manage that, the Ardeatine Caves,"
said Frati. He was referring to the former Nazi concentration camp in
southern Germany and to the notorious World War II massacre of 333
Italian civilians in Rome by Nazi troops.

Rome's mayor Gianni Alemanno has stated his opposition to university
lecturers with such views. "I don't think a professor who holds
Holocaust-denying views can teach at 'La Sapienza," he stated.

The president of the Lazio region surrounding Rome, Piero Marazzo, and
of the Province of Rome, Nicola Zingaretti condemned Caracciolo's views.

'La Sapienza' professors and students also expressed shock and dismay at
the content of Caracciolo's blogs. The head of the Political Science
Faculty, where Caracciolo teaches, Gianluigi Rossi, said it was "a very
bad day." Social sciences undergraduate Massimo, from Florence,
described Caracciolo's Holocaust-denying views as "extremely serious."

Caracciolo has denied he is a "historical revisionist" and says he
believes in freedom of thought and expression which are guaranteed under
the Italian constitution.

It is not the first time that an Italian academic has expressed such
views. In November last year, Roberto Valvo, a high-school history
teacher was suspended after he claimed there was "no proof" of the

In May 2007, authorities barred a visit to Italy by the French
Holocaust-denying historian Robert Faurisson, on the invitation of
Claudio Moffa, a lecturer at the Univerity of Teramo in Italy's central
Abruzzo region. The move came after heated protests from Italy's Jewish
community. Caracciolo had defended the planned debate.

Source: The Hoffman Wire;
Freedom of the Press: A hallowed right.
Responsible Dissent: A contribution to understanding and dialogue.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

The Five Falsehoods of Zionism

We can live among other nations and states only as long as we succeed in persuading them that the Jews are not a distinct people, but are the representatives of a religious faith who, therefore, constitute a 'religious community,' though this be of a peculiar character. As a matter of fact, this is the greatest of our falsehoods.

(The Jews have established five major falsehoods which work to conceal their nature and protect their status and power, to wit:

1) The Jews are Israelites, and thus God's chosen people;
2) Jesus Christ was a Jew;
3) That 6 million Jews were killed in a holocaust during WW II;
4) That all races are equal, or that all are brothers; and,
5) That the Jews are just another religious group.)

We are obliged to conceal our own particular character and mode of life so that we will be allowed to continue our existence as a parasite among the nations. Our success in this line has gone so far that many believe that the Jews among them are genuine Frenchmen, or Englishmen, or Italians, or Germans who just happen to belong to a religious denomination which is different from that prevailing in these countries. Especially in circles concerned with government, where the officials have only a minimum of historical sense, we are able to impose our infamous deception with comparative ease. Therefore, there is never the slightest suspicion that we Jews form a distinct nation and are not merely the adherents of a 'confession.' Though one glance at the press which we control ought to furnish sufficient evidence to the contrary, even for those who possess only the smallest degree of intelligence.

Editor's Note: Taken from Walter White, Jr.'s interview with Harold Rosenthal, associate of New York Senator Jacob K. Javits, in 1976. Mr. Rosenthal was allegedly assassinated shortly thereafter for being too frank in this rare interview entitled, "Hidden Tyranny: The Rosenthal Document."

Monday, October 19, 2009


Written by Jose V. Malcioln

Even the sound of the term “Jewishness” is obnoxious. It has patronizing as well as obsequious connotations. In this particular case, it is euphemistic and much more pseudolinguistic than “Semitic,” another meaningless word. How does one authenticate Jewishness? How does one recognize a Jewish Semite? One might say the authenticity of Hebrews, Jews, or Gentiles can only be determined through religious practices. The difference or degree of “Jewishness” calculable among Hebrews and Edomites, Jews and Goyim, is merely one of individual responsibility. An Edomite may claim to be Jewish while he eats bacon, pork sausages, cheats in business, and worships money instead of Hashem (God).

The same Germanic or Russianic descendant of converts will often be the claimant of godly authority to authenticate other people who usually respect the laws, and worship God more faithfully and honestly than he. Nevertheless, his material and political power, and his added military might, afford him the authority to force defenseless people suffering starvation and other hardships to succumb to the survival of his dictates. After all, survival is of primary importance in these times when power is the only reality, and spirituality and religiousness are actually losing ground to materiality, and constantly reinforced with modern technology.

The authenticity of Falashas through “Jewishness” cannot be truthfully, honestly discussed without an overall introduction to the Jews, their origin, definition of Jewishness, and an accurate analysis of their definition related to ethnicity and identity.

The same demand should be made concerning authenticated “Semiticness.” Who is a Semite? Are the Palestinians Semites? Are the Ethiopians, Arabs, Lebanese, Libyans, and other people of that area Semites? This term is pseudolinguistic. It could well be a term adopted by certain people for political, economic and even religious advantages. The term as an ethnic stamp is so vague that even its origin is unrelated to it. The etymological root shows the term evolving from the Latin semita to Spanish semita meaning footpath. This term now legitimized advantageously is really a “footpath” toward special considerations, pity and empathy while enmasking expansionism through violence; acts which disturb many Jews even more than some Gentiles.

Prof. Jose V. Malcioln was born in Panama of a Moroccan-Hebrew mother. He taught in the New York school system for many years. He also taught in Mexico, Spain, Amherst, Brooklyn, Boricua and Malcolm-King Colleges. He is a graduate of the City College of New York, Baruch College, Columbia University and obtained his Ph.D. at the Institute Ibero Americano, Madrid, Spain. His wife's name is Benedicta. Prof. Malcioln is the author of the now out-of-print classic The African Origins of Modern Judaism: From Hebrews to Jews.

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Saturday, October 17, 2009

An American President?

Editor's Note: The following is a striking insight into the nationality of President Obama. This article was published by a Kenyan news source 5 years ago, shortly before he reached the Senate.

Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate
Sunday, June 27, 2004

Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

The allegations that horrified fellow Republicans and caused his once-promising candidacy to implode in four short days have given Obama a clear lead as Republicans struggled to fetch an alternative.

Ryan’s campaign began to crumble on Monday following the release of embarrassing records from his divorce. In the records, his ex-wife, Boston Public actress Jeri Ryan, said her former husband took her to kinky sex clubs in Paris, New York and New Orleans.

"It’s clear to me that a vigorous debate on the issues most likely could not take place if I remain in the race," Ryan, 44, said in a statement. "What would take place, rather, is a brutal, scorched-earth campaign – the kind of campaign that has turned off so many voters, the kind of politics I refuse to play."

Although Ryan disputed the allegations, saying he and his wife went to one ‘avant-garde’ club in Paris and left because they felt uncomfortable, lashed out at the media and said it was "truly outrageous" that the Chicago Tribune got a judge to unseal the records.

The Republican choice will become an instant underdog in the campaign for the seat of retiring Republican Senator Peter Fitzgerald, since Obama held a wide lead even before the scandal broke.

"I feel for him actually," Obama told a Chicago TV station. "What he’s gone through over the last three days I think is something you wouldn’t wish on anybody."

The Republican state committee must now choose a replacement for Ryan, who had won in the primaries against seven contenders. Its task is complicated by the fact that Obama holds a comfortable lead in the polls and is widely regarded as a rising Democratic star.

The chairwoman of the Illinois Republican Party, Judy Topinka, said at a news conference, after Ryan withdrew, that Republicans would probably take several weeks to settle on a new candidate.

"Obviously, this is a bad week for our party and our state," she said.

As recently as Thursday, spokesmen for the Ryan campaign still insisted that Ryan would remain in the race. Ryan had defended himself saying, "There’s no breaking of any laws. There’s no breaking of any marriage laws. There’s no breaking of the Ten Commandments anywhere."


Copyright © 2004 . The Standard Ltd
The Standard Ltd
I & M Building, Kenyatta Avenue,
P.O Box 30080, 00100 GPO, Nairobi-Kenya.
Tel. +254 20 3222111, Fax: +254 20 214467, 229218, 218965.
News room Tel: +254 20 3222111, Fax: +254 20 213108.

Holocaust-denying bishop charged

October 16, 2009 | Wire services

GERMAN prosecutors have filed a complaint against a British bishop,
Richard Williamson, for inciting racial hatred after he said "not one
Jew" was killed in Nazi gas chambers.

The competent court in Regensburg, southern Germany, must now decide
whether to accept the charges, its president, Johann Ploed, said, adding
that the decision would come in around one week. Any punishment would
likely be a fine, he said today. If Bishop Williamson accepted the fine,
there would be no need for a public trial.

Bishop Williamson sparked controversy in January when he gave a
television interview in the vicinity of Regensburg in which he said:
"There was not one Jew killed by the gas chambers. It was all lies,
lies, lies." The bishop said he believed "200,000 to 300,000 Jews
perished in Nazi concentration camps, but none of them by gas chambers".

The outburst prompted a very rare comment on religious matters by German
Chancellor Angela Merkel, who called on Pope Benedict XVI to "clarify
unambiguously that there can be no denial" the Nazis killed six million

The scandal carried particular resonance as it was Nazi Germany that
masterminded and carried out the murders during World War II, and
because the 82-year-old pope is German. Denying that the Holocaust took
place is illegal in Germany and Austria.

Source: The Hoffman Wire

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Netanyahu: No war crimes trials for Israelis

Editor's Note: I am not shocked.

By JOSEF FEDERMAN, Associated Press Writer

JERUSALEM – Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday vowed never to allow Israeli leaders or soldiers to stand trial on war crimes charges over their actions during last winter's military offensive in the Gaza Strip, furiously denouncing a U.N. report in a keynote address to parliament.

Netanyahu's fiery rhetoric — and his decision to open the high-profile speech with remarks on the report — reflected the deep distress felt among Israeli leaders after a U.N. commission accused Israel of intentionally harming civilians when it launched a massive attack in Gaza to stop years of rocket fire.

"This distorted report, written by this distorted committee, undermines Israel's right to defend itself. This report encourages terrorism and threatens peace," Netanyahu said in his address at the opening of parliament's winter session. "Israel will not take risks for peace if it can't defend itself."

The U.N. report, compiled by a team led by former war crimes prosecutor Richard Goldstone, accused both Israel and Hamas of war crimes and possible crimes against humanity. It specifically accused Israel of using disproportionate force, deliberately targeting civilians and destroying civilian infrastructure, and using people as human shields. It accused Hamas of deliberately targeting civilians and trying to spread terror through its rocket attacks.

Israeli officials across the board have condemned the report, saying their country had little choice but to take harsh action against militants who were terrorizing southern Israel. They also blame Hamas for civilian casualties, saying the Islamic militant group took cover in residential areas during the fighting. However, Goldstone's strong credentials as a respected South African jurist, his Jewish faith and past support for Israeli causes have made it hard for Israel to dismiss the claims.

Netanyahu angrily noted the report's portrayal of Israeli leaders as war criminals. "The truth is exactly the opposite. Israel's leaders and its army are those who defended the citizens of Israel from war criminals," he said, before vowing to defend the country's wartime leaders.

"We will not allow Ehud Olmert, Tzipi Livni and Ehud Barak, who sent our sons to war, to arrive at the international court in the Hague," he said.

While Netanyahu has repeatedly lashed out at the U.N. report, Monday's comments appeared to be a direct response to a new Palestinian push for a vote on the report in the U.N.'s Human Rights Council. If the vote takes place, the matter could be referred to higher U.N. bodies that could theoretically push for war-crimes prosecution.

Earlier this month, Abbas' government had agreed to delay the vote for six months. That decision, which came under heavy U.S. pressure, sparked sharp criticism and protests across Palestinian society, particularly from the rival Hamas government in the Gaza Strip.

U.N. spokeswoman Michele Montas said Monday that Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon spoke with Abbas on Sunday about the matter and said he would support Abbas' proposal to reopen discussion of the Goldstone report at the Human Rights Council in Geneva.

In contrast to predecessors who have used parliamentary addresses to speak of bold visions of peace, Netanyahu spoke in far bleaker terms. He focused on past Jewish suffering and criticized the futility of previous peace efforts, blaming Arab adversaries for their failure.

"The right to a Jewish state and the right to self-defense are two of the existential rights of our people," he said. "These basic rights of the Jewish people have been under greatly increasing attack. ... Our prime mission is to stave off this attack."

President Barack Obama has been trying to persuade the Israelis and Palestinians to restart peace talks, which broke down late last year. Even after receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, he faces a daunting challenge in just getting the sides to talk, let alone in solving one of the world's longest lasting and most intractable conflicts.

The Palestinians say they will not resume negotiations until Israel freezes all construction in Jewish settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem — areas they claim as parts of a future independent state.

Netanyahu says some settlement construction must continue to accommodate growth in the Jewish populations. He also says all of Jerusalem will remain in Israeli hands, although Israel's annexation of the eastern part of the city and its sensitive holy sites has never been internationally recognized.

Netanyahu, for his part, has demanded the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state — a demand the Palestinians criticize as upping the ante from previous negotiations. The Palestinians say it would discriminate against Israel's Arab minority and deprive Palestinian refugees of their rights to lost properties in what is now Israel.

"For 62 years, the Palestinians have been saying 'No' to the Jewish state. I am once again calling upon our Palestinian neighbors; say 'Yes' to the Jewish state." he said. "Without recognition of Israel as the state of the Jews we shall not be able to attain peace."

(This version CORRECTS name to Human Rights Council)

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.

Originally posted online by Yahoo! News: Mon Oct 12, 7:57 pm ET

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Television Drama Series About the Israeli Holocaust Against the Palestinians Debuts


Israel summons Turkey envoy over brutish TV portrayal of IDF
Haaretz | October 14, 2009

Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman on Wednesday summoned the
Turkish ambassador to Israel in protest over a new television drama
airing in Turkey that depicts Israel Defense Forces soldiers as brutal
murderers. Lieberman instructed staff at the Foreign Ministry to protest
in the face of their Turkish counterparts. He stressed that airing this
type of show reflects a grave level of incitement - and with government

The show, called Ayrilik, features a love story that develops between
the lead characters during Israel's offensive in the Gaza Strip,
according to Israeli media reports. However, a partial episode available
on YouTube depicts multiple images of the IDF brutalizing the
Palestinian population by shooting children in the chest and kicking
elderly people on the ground, among other things.

In the clip, Israeli soldiers can be seen shooting a smiling young girl
in the chest, steamrolling a tank through a crowded street and lining up
a firing squad to shoot at Palestinians. The show airs on Turkish
State-sponsored television channel TRT1, according to Israeli media

They also reported that the drama's Web site says it "brings to life the
bleeding wound of Palestine. The show depicts all sides of the
generations-long tragedy... This season focuses on the women and
children and the Palestinian story, as well as the notion that the
ultimate solution is love, compassion and world peace."

Source: The Hoffman Wire

Monday, October 12, 2009

Rethinking Columbus: An American Legend

Independently Researched and Verified
by Neyo Webster

Prelude: The Lies

We are taught in U.S. schools that Christopher Columbus “discovered” America in 1492. We are taught that he was an Italian from the city of Genoa. We are taught that he was embarking on finding a trade route to India to obtain riches as described by Marco Polo. We are even taught that he got lost, thinking he was in India where Polo allegedly went. The goal of this paper is to debunk the aforementioned myths.

Christopher Columbus is an interesting character. He has become a legend. In my estimation, he is the personification of America, more so than George Washington is.

The Man and His Origins

Christopher Columbus was not Italian. He was a Spaniard. And I am of the firm persuasion that he was also a Jew. He was born Cristobal Colon (and according to research, he never spoke or wrote Italian). He was a fluent speaker of Castilian Spanish or Castellano. With this fluency in Spanish, he moved with ease and accessibility in the highest circles of the Spanish court, thus establishing powerfully knit connections.

He was the son of Susanna Fontanarossa [alternatively spelled Fonterosa] and Domingo Pontevedra. Both of these surnames were characteristically Jewish in medieval Spain. It is suggested that his parents were Marranos, or secret Jews. The historical record validates this claim. It is written by Henry L. Golden and Martin Rywell, in Jews in American History: Their Contribution to the United States of America, that his lineage pointed to Jewish roots—the record indicated that his mother Susanna Fonterosa was the “daughter of Jacob, granddaughter of Abraham and a Jewess.” His father Domingo Pontevedra-Colon was a map seller. It is believed that they had escaped from Spain to Genoa during one of the pogroms, or Jewish expulsions from Spain. Jews had had been expelled from European communities from as early as 1012 from Mainz up until 1891 from Moscow. The Jews had been expelled from Spain in 1492. This date is key which will be developed later in this paper.

The Financial Backing of Columbus

George Cohen in his text, The Jew in the Making of America, states, “Not jewels, but Jews, were the real financial basis for the first expedition of Columbus.” The background of Columbus’ association with Jewish bankers is rather intriguing. When Columbus first plotted his course, he used charts prepared by Judah Creques, curiously known as “the map Jew.” He was head of the Portuguese School of Navigation in Lisbon. The almanacs and astronomical tables gathered for the voyage were assembled by Abraham ben Zacuto, a professor at the University of Salamanca. It was Zacuto who introduced Columbus to Don Issac Abravanel, a prominent Jewish banker, who was one of the first to offer Columbus financial backing.

Christopher Columbus had been financed by other wealthy Jewish merchants directly and indirectly through monies donated or confiscated through them. Three Marranos (secret or crypto-Jews) Luis de Santangel (or Santangelo), Gabriel Sanchez, and Juan Cabrero influenced Queen Isabella to help him finance the voyage. Columbus mentioned de Santangel particularly in his diary that he made a substantial loan to him for the purpose of exploration. Luis de Santangel, along with Cabrero invested 17,000 ducats, which would be equivalent to over $100,000 today. Luis de Santangel was chancellor of the royal household and controller general of Aragon, an autonomous community located in northeastern Spain. This was a very influential and well-connected bunch, to say the least.

Lost in America?

The famous Jewish Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal was convinced that, “the Jews, concerned about their deterioration in Spain, were looking for a homeland, a place to flee to, where they could find a protector. And so, in belief that the ten lost tribes had found refuge in ‘India,’ they financed the expedition of Columbus: a man they could trust.” They trusted him because he was Jewish. Jews are very reserved about trusting a “non-Jew”, especially with the future of their posterity. Wiesenthal also asserts that Columbus was surely a Converso [a convert from Judaism to Christianity] and quite likely a Marrano [a convert to Christianity who secretly remained Jewish].

History also teaches us Columbus was an experienced sailor long before his infamous voyage West. In the course of his letters, writes Sir Arthur Helps, “[Columbus] speaks after the fashion of a practised slave dealer.” In fact, the day after the Spanish expulsion in 1492, Columbus took a group of Jewish refugees to the New World. This validates Wiesenthal’s claim of the Jews gathering around Columbus for the purpose of seeking a homeland outside of Europe.

The three ships he sailed with were La Nina, Pinta, y Santa Maria. Before Columbus set sail for America, African explorers had reached its shores before he did. These explorers reached Panama in the year 1310. Columbus followed the same route taken by Abu-Bari II of Mali in 1310.

The African traders visiting the Americas told Columbus that they were called Indies. This sheds some light on the legendary story of Christopher Columbus “accidently” arriving in the Americas thinking he was India and calling the Natives “Indians.” Based on this pertinent information, I must conclude that Columbus knew where he was headed and he called the natives “Indians” based on the account of the Africans calling the so-called “New World” the “Indies.” The whole “accident” story is a gross fabrication of the facts. It is an inconceivable invention!

The modern school textbook does not even mention anymore the story of Columbus thinking he was in India. There is more than meets the eye regarding Columbus.

The African Presence aboard the Three Ships

Ironically, his pilots Nuflo de Olano, Alfonso Nino, and the navigator Estevanico were of African origin, perhaps even Sephardic Jews. More than likely their descendants came to Spain by way of the Moorish invasion of Spain in 711 overrunning the then ruling Visigoths. The Moors were from North Africa in what is now Mauritania, Morocco, and other parts of the Northern strip of the African continent.

The Slave-Dealing Jew

In addition to Columbus being Jewish, he was also a slave dealer and murderer. In 1498, he brought back 600 Indians as slaves to Spain from a five-ship expedition. Columbus was no ignorant fool. He was out for money and power and quite sadly a Jewish pawn caught up in a debacle of political intrigue.

Author’s Credits

The author would like to acknowledge and credit the invaluable research efforts of The Nation of Islam, Jose V. Malcioln, Stephen Birmingham, and the anonymous author of the 2,000 page online text When Victims Rule: A Critique of Jewish Preeminence in America, without which this report could not be written.

Copyright © 2009 Zionism Unveiled Productions. All Rights Reserved.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto

Karl Marx describes in his communist manifesto, the ten steps necessary to destroy a free enterprise system and replace it with a system of omnipotent government power, so as to effect a communist socialist state. Following are the original ten planks within the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848, followed by a discussion of how America has adopted each of the planks.

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rent to public purpose.

The courts have interpreted the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868) to give the government far more "eminent domain" power than was originally intended. Under the rubric of "eminent domain" and various zoning regulations, land use regulations by the Bureau of Land Management property taxes, and "environmental" excuses, private property rights have become very diluted. As a result, private property in lands, vehicles, and other forms are seized almost every day in this country under the "forfeiture" provisions of the RICO statutes and the so-called War on Drugs. Private owners of property are required to get permission from government relative to the use of their property.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

The 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913 (which some scholars maintain was never properly ratified), the Social Security Act of 1936, Joint House Resolution 192of 1933, and various State income taxes established this major Marxist coup in the United States many decades ago. These taxes continue to drain the lifeblood out of the American economy and greatly reduce the accumulation of desperately needed capital for future growth, business starts, job creation, and salary increases.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

Another Marxist attack on private property rights is in the form of Federal & State estate taxes and other inheritance taxes, which have abolished or at least greatly diluted the right of private property owners to determine the disposition and distribution of their estates upon their death.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

We call it government seizures, tax liens, "forfeiture" Public "law" 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process.

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

The Federal Reserve System, created by the Federal Reserve Act of Congress in 1913, is indeed such a "national bank" and it politically manipulates interest rates and holds a monopoly on legal counterfeiting in the United States. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) another privately-owned corporation. The Federal Reserve Banks issue Fiat Paper Money and practice economically destructive fractional reserve banking. This is exactly what Marx had in mind and completely fulfills this plank.

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the State.

In the U.S., communication and transportation are controlled and regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) established by the Communications Act of 1934and the Department of Transportation and the Interstate Commerce Commission (established by Congress in 1887), and the Federal Aviation Administration as well as Executive orders 11490, 10999 -- not to mention various state bureaucracies and regulations including State mandated driver's licenses. Federal Highway Act of 1916 made federal funds available to States for highway construction), the Interstate Highway System, 1944 (funding began 1956); Interstate Commerce Commission given authority by Congress to regulate trucking and carriers on inland waterways, 1935-40. There is also the federal postal monopoly, AMTRAK and CONRAIL -- outright socialist (government-owned) enterprises. Instead of free-market private enterprise in these important industries, these fields in America are semi-cartels through the governments regulatory-industrial complex.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

We call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations. The Agriculture Adjustment Act of 1933 provided that farmers will receive government aid if and only if they relinquish control of farming activities.

8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

We call it the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor and it's seen in Minimum Wage and slave labor like dealing with our Most Favored Nation trade partner; i.e. Communist China. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two "income" family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920's, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000. And I almost forgot...The Equal Rights Amendment means that women should do all work that men do including the military and since passage it would make women subject to the draft.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.

We call it the Planning Reorganization Act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "law" 89-136. Food processing companies, with the co-operation of the Farmers Home Administration foreclosures, are buying up farms and creating "conglomerates."

10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.

Americans are being taxed to support what we call 'public' schools, but are actually "government force-tax-funded schools " Even private schools are government regulated. The purpose is to train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based "Education". The federal influence of education is evident in "head-start" programs, school lunch programs, textbooks, and library books. Our children are being indoctrinated and inculcated with the government propaganda, like "majority rules", and "pay your fair share". WHERE are the words "fair share" in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26)?? NO WHERE is "fair share" even suggested !! The philosophical concept of "fair share" comes from the Communist maxim, "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need! This concept is pure socialism.


Editor's Note: The Communist Party upon its inception was (and still is) largely Jewish. Karl Heinrich Marx was no exception. Born Moses Mordechai Levy, Marx was a German Jew raised up in a Rabbinic family. He rejected Judaism and embraced the atheistic pathway to interpreting life. His doctrine of Communism has since corrupted the world as we have it today. In addition to penning The Communist Manifesto, he wrote Das Kapital: A Critique of Political Economy. Admittedly, the man was a diabolical genius. It is the Communists who have invented international democracy, which is veiled tyranny.